• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用复选法(CATA)对13个国家消费者对休闲食品成分的回避情况进行跨文化分析。

Cross-Cultural Analysis of Consumers' Avoidance of Snack Food Ingredients Across 13 Countries Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Method.

作者信息

Cho Yunjeong, Chambers Edgar, Lee Jeehyun

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46243, Republic of Korea.

Center for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.

出版信息

Foods. 2025 May 13;14(10):1729. doi: 10.3390/foods14101729.

DOI:10.3390/foods14101729
PMID:40428509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12111002/
Abstract

Snack foods are increasingly important because of irregular eating patterns in busy lives. Many consumers state that reading ingredients is important to them making rational choices when consuming snacks. This study investigates consumer's reported avoidance of a wide range of 20 current and potential snack food ingredients. A survey of approximately 630 consumers in each of 13 countries was conducted using a Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) method. Cochran's Q test was performed to compare percentages of avoidance among countries, and correspondence analysis and cluster analysis were conducted to visualize the similarity of avoidance tendency among countries. Results showed a high tendency to avoid insect powder, SAPP, and BHA, perhaps because of connotations such as disgust or their "non-natural" connotations. The aversion rates for soybean, corn, wheat flour, and pea flour were low. Significant differences ( < 0.05) between countries were found for all 20 ingredients. The countries were grouped into seven clusters based on similar avoidance tendencies. This research offers insights into consumer perceptions of snack food ingredients, helping manufacturers understand ingredient avoidance across cultures. These findings support tailored product strategies to enhance food safety policies. Ultimately, the study contributes valuable data for global marketing strategies and promotes innovation in response to health-conscious consumer trends.

摘要

由于忙碌生活中不规律的饮食模式,休闲食品变得越来越重要。许多消费者表示,阅读配料表对于他们在食用休闲食品时做出理性选择很重要。本研究调查了消费者报告的对20种当前和潜在休闲食品配料的回避情况。使用复选法(CATA)对13个国家的约630名消费者进行了调查。进行了 Cochr an's Q检验以比较各国之间的回避百分比,并进行了对应分析和聚类分析以可视化各国之间回避趋势的相似性。结果表明,人们很倾向于回避昆虫粉、变性淀粉磷酸酯(SAPP)和丁基羟基茴香醚(BHA),这可能是因为它们带有厌恶等含义或“非天然”的含义。对大豆、玉米、小麦粉和豌豆粉的厌恶率较低。发现所有20种配料在各国之间均存在显著差异(<0.05)。根据相似的回避趋势,这些国家被分为七个类别。这项研究为了解消费者对休闲食品配料的看法提供了见解,有助于制造商了解不同文化背景下对配料的回避情况。这些发现支持了量身定制的产品策略,以加强食品安全政策。最终,该研究为全球营销策略提供了有价值的数据,并推动了针对注重健康的消费趋势的创新。

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Analysis of Consumers' Avoidance of Snack Food Ingredients Across 13 Countries Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Method.使用复选法(CATA)对13个国家消费者对休闲食品成分的回避情况进行跨文化分析。
Foods. 2025 May 13;14(10):1729. doi: 10.3390/foods14101729.
2
Cross-Cultural Comparison (13 Countries) of Consumers' Willingness to Eat Specific Insect Powders in Five Food Types.13个国家消费者对五种食物类型中特定昆虫粉的食用意愿的跨文化比较
Foods. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):841. doi: 10.3390/foods14050841.
3
Consumer Sensory Perceptions of Natural Ingredients: A Multi-Country Comparison.消费者对天然成分的感官认知:多国比较
Foods. 2025 May 16;14(10):1775. doi: 10.3390/foods14101775.
4
Understanding Brazilian consumer sensory and hedonic perception for salty snacks.了解巴西消费者对咸味零食的感官和享乐感知。
J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Feb;58(2):586-594. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04571-7. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Predictive Models of Consumer Flour-Handling Behaviors and Recall Awareness.消费者面粉处理行为及召回意识的预测模型
J Food Prot. 2025 Apr 22;88(5):100480. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100480. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
6
A Comparison of the Percentage of "Yes" (Agree) Responses and Importance of Attributes (Constructs) determined using Check-All-That-Apply and Check-All-Statements (Yes/No) Question Formats in Five Countries.五个国家中使用“全选适用项”和“全选陈述(是/否)”问题格式确定的“是”(同意)回答百分比与属性(结构)重要性的比较。
Foods. 2020 Oct 28;9(11):1566. doi: 10.3390/foods9111566.
7
Consumer Avoidance of Insect Containing Foods: Primary Emotions, Perceptions and Sensory Characteristics Driving Consumers Considerations.消费者对含昆虫食品的回避:驱动消费者考量的主要情感、认知及感官特征
Foods. 2019 Aug 17;8(8):351. doi: 10.3390/foods8080351.
8
Consumer acceptability in the USA, Mexico, and Spain of chocolate chip cookies made with partial insect powder replacement.美国、墨西哥和西班牙消费者对部分用昆虫粉替代制作的巧克力曲奇饼干的接受度。
J Food Sci. 2020 Jun;85(6):1621-1628. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15175. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Legume Flour or Bran: Sustainable, Fiber-Rich Ingredients for Extruded Snacks?豆科植物面粉或麸皮:用于挤压型零食的可持续、富含纤维的原料?
Foods. 2020 Nov 17;9(11):1680. doi: 10.3390/foods9111680.
10
Consumer Perception of Red Wine by the Degree of Familiarity Using Consumer-Based Methodology.基于消费者的方法,按熟悉程度对消费者对红酒的认知进行研究。
Foods. 2021 Apr 1;10(4):749. doi: 10.3390/foods10040749.

本文引用的文献

1
Glycemic index and glycemic load of brief sugary sweets: randomized controlled trials of eight Thai desserts.简易含糖糖果的血糖生成指数和血糖负荷:八种泰国甜点的随机对照试验
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 30;11:1452602. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1452602. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing the Likelihood of Buying Thai Local Snacks.评估购买泰国当地零食的可能性。
Foods. 2024 Oct 27;13(21):3419. doi: 10.3390/foods13213419.
3
Research Progress and Production Status of Edible Insects as Food in China.中国食用昆虫作为食物的研究进展与生产现状
Foods. 2024 Jun 24;13(13):1986. doi: 10.3390/foods13131986.
4
Edible Insects: A New Sustainable Nutritional Resource Worth Promoting.可食用昆虫:一种值得推广的新型可持续营养资源。
Foods. 2023 Nov 9;12(22):4073. doi: 10.3390/foods12224073.
5
Edible Insects as Food-Insect Welfare and Ethical Aspects from a Consumer Perspective.从消费者视角看可食用昆虫作为食物——昆虫福利与伦理问题
Insects. 2022 Jan 25;13(2):121. doi: 10.3390/insects13020121.
6
Comparing Four Question Formats in Five Languages for On-Line Consumer Surveys.五种语言在线消费者调查中四种问题格式的比较
Methods Protoc. 2020 Jul 14;3(3):49. doi: 10.3390/mps3030049.
7
Trust me? Consumer trust in expert information on food product labels.相信我?消费者对食品产品标签上专家信息的信任。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Mar;137:111170. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111170. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
8
Entomophagy: Nutritional, ecological, safety and legislation aspects.食用昆虫:营养、生态、安全和法规方面。
Food Res Int. 2019 Dec;126:108672. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108672. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Consumer Avoidance of Insect Containing Foods: Primary Emotions, Perceptions and Sensory Characteristics Driving Consumers Considerations.消费者对含昆虫食品的回避:驱动消费者考量的主要情感、认知及感官特征
Foods. 2019 Aug 17;8(8):351. doi: 10.3390/foods8080351.
10
European consumers' readiness to adopt insects as food. A review.欧洲消费者对食用昆虫的接受程度。综述。
Food Res Int. 2019 Aug;122:661-678. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.041. Epub 2019 Jan 18.