Suppr超能文献

手术中偶然发现的法律和伦理困境:综述文章。

Legal & ethical dilemmas in incidental findings during surgery: Review article.

机构信息

Kent Law School, Eliot College, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NZ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2020 Mar;75:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.141. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discovering IF (incidental findings) during surgery results in ethical and legal dilemmas for the surgeon, especially those in training or recently qualified. The situation is further compounded as these can occur in an emergency. The immediacy of making the correct decision can be paramount for both the surgeon and the patient.

METHODS

Firstly, this article will review the ethical and legal frameworks of IF during surgery for those unfamiliar on the literature. Secondly, it will evaluate the use of a proposed IF tool to illustrate the decision-making processes in published case reports for those unfamiliar to the process. After the above two have been completed, a decision-making IF guidance tool will be constructed, which could help educate trainee surgeons.

RESULTS

The ethical and legal frameworks include the Hippocratic oath, domestic and European legislation, case law, civil and criminal laws. In the evaluated case reports there were IF which were either life-threatening or affecting the immediate life of the patients. 90% of the cases were emergency and 10% were elective operations. Using the proposed IF tool and combining it with peer-reviewed published best practice, 60% of the cases were correct in their intra-operative decision-making. This demonstrates the need of some type of guidance on the subject. As a consequence of these results, the article describes the construction of an IF decision-making guidance tool. The essential components of the guidance tool involve decision-making, the inference from other medical fields, ethical and legal elements, the available experience, skills and specialist knowledge at the time, best clinical practice and post-operative management and counselling.

CONCLUSIONS

On finding an IF during surgery, the surgeon must balance the ethical dilemmas of autonomy, beneficence, justice, and non-maleficence for the patient. This is further complicated by applying these principals to current civil and criminal laws. By constructing an IF guidance tool may assist in improving patient safety and help the trainee and newly qualified surgeon and his team to come to the correct decisions in the best interests of the patient.

摘要

背景

在手术过程中发现 IF(偶然发现)会给外科医生带来伦理和法律困境,尤其是那些正在接受培训或刚获得资格的医生。这种情况在紧急情况下会更加复杂。对于外科医生和患者来说,做出正确决定的紧迫性至关重要。

方法

首先,本文将为不熟悉相关文献的人回顾手术中 IF 的伦理和法律框架。其次,它将评估使用拟议的 IF 工具来评估发表的病例报告中决策过程,以帮助那些不熟悉该过程的人。在完成上述两项工作后,将构建一个决策 IF 指导工具,以帮助教育受训外科医生。

结果

伦理和法律框架包括希波克拉底誓言、国内和欧洲立法、判例法、民法和刑法。在评估的病例报告中,有危及生命或直接影响患者生命的 IF。90%的病例是紧急手术,10%是择期手术。使用拟议的 IF 工具并结合同行评议的最佳实践,60%的病例在术中决策中是正确的。这表明需要在该主题上提供某种指导。由于这些结果,本文描述了构建 IF 决策指导工具。指导工具的基本组成部分包括决策、从其他医学领域推断、伦理和法律要素、当时可用的经验、技能和专业知识、最佳临床实践以及术后管理和咨询。

结论

在手术中发现 IF 时,外科医生必须平衡患者自主权、善行、正义和不伤害的伦理困境。这在将这些原则应用于当前的民法和刑法时会更加复杂。通过构建 IF 指导工具,可以帮助提高患者安全性,并帮助受训和新获得资格的外科医生及其团队为患者的最佳利益做出正确决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验