• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较深吸气屏气与俯卧位乳房放疗的前瞻性试验。

A Prospective Trial to Compare Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold With Prone Breast Irradiation.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct;10(5):330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2020.01.001
PMID:32014615
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare heart and lung doses for adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) between radiation plans generated supine with deep inspiratory breath hold (S-DIBH) and prone with free-breathing (P-FB) and examine the effect of breast volume (BV) on dosimetric parameters.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with left breast ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer receiving adjuvant WBI were enrolled on a single-institutional prospective protocol. Patients were simulated S-DIBH and P-FB; plans were generated using both scans. Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-sum tests were used to compare intrapatient differences between plans for the entire cohort and within BV groups defined by tertiles.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled. Thirty-four patients are included in the analysis owing to patient withdrawal or inability to hold breath. With WBI dose of 4005 to 4256 cGy, mean heart dose (MHD) was 80 cGy in S-DIBH and 77 cGy in P-FB (P = .08). Mean ipsilateral lung dose (MLD) was 453 cGy in S-DIBH and 45 cGy in P-FB (P < .0001). Mean and max left anterior descending artery doses were 251 cGy and 551 cGy in S-DIBH, respectively (P = .1), and 324 cGy and 993 cGy in P-FB, respectively (P = .3). Hot spot and separation were 109% and 22 cm in S-DIBH, respectively, and 107% and 16 cm in P-FB, respectively (P < .0001). For patients with smallest BV, S-DIBH improved MHD and left anterior descending artery doses; for those with largest BV, P-FB improved cardiac dosimetry. With increasing BV, there was an increasing advantage of P-FB for MHD (P = .05), and max (P = .03) and mean (P = .02) left anterior descending artery doses, and the reduction in MLD, hot spot, and separation with P-FB increased (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

MHD did not differ between P-FB and S-DIBH, whereas MLD was significantly lower with P-FB. Analysis according to breast volume revealed improved cardiac dosimetry with S-DIBH for women with smallest BV and improved cardiac dosimetry with P-FB for women with larger BV, thereby providing a dosimetric rationale for using breast size to help determine the optimal positioning for WBI.

摘要

目的

比较使用深吸气屏气(S-DIBH)仰卧位和自由呼吸(P-FB)俯卧位生成的辅助全乳照射(WBI)放疗计划的心肺剂量,并研究乳房体积(BV)对剂量学参数的影响。

方法与材料

本研究为单中心前瞻性研究,纳入了接受辅助 WBI 的左乳腺癌导管原位癌或浸润性癌患者。患者接受 S-DIBH 和 P-FB 模拟;使用两种扫描方法生成计划。对整个队列和按三分位数定义的 BV 组内的计划,采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验和秩和检验进行比较。

结果

共纳入 40 例患者。由于患者退出或无法屏气,34 例患者纳入分析。当 WBI 剂量为 4005 至 4256 cGy 时,S-DIBH 组的平均心脏剂量(MHD)为 80 cGy,P-FB 组为 77 cGy(P =.08)。S-DIBH 组的同侧肺平均剂量(MLD)为 453 cGy,P-FB 组为 45 cGy(P <.0001)。S-DIBH 组的左前降支平均剂量和最大剂量分别为 251 cGy 和 551 cGy(P =.1),P-FB 组分别为 324 cGy 和 993 cGy(P =.3)。S-DIBH 组的热点和分离分别为 109%和 22 cm,P-FB 组分别为 107%和 16 cm(P <.0001)。对于 BV 最小的患者,S-DIBH 改善了 MHD 和左前降支剂量;对于 BV 最大的患者,P-FB 改善了心脏剂量学。随着 BV 的增加,P-FB 对 MHD(P =.05)、最大(P =.03)和平均(P =.02)左前降支剂量的优势增加,而 MLD、热点和分离的降低也增加(P <.05)。

结论

P-FB 和 S-DIBH 之间的 MHD 没有差异,而 P-FB 的 MLD 显著更低。根据乳房体积进行分析显示,对于 BV 最小的女性,S-DIBH 改善了心脏剂量学,对于 BV 较大的女性,P-FB 改善了心脏剂量学,从而为使用乳房大小来帮助确定 WBI 的最佳定位提供了剂量学依据。

相似文献

1
A Prospective Trial to Compare Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold With Prone Breast Irradiation.一项比较深吸气屏气与俯卧位乳房放疗的前瞻性试验。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep-Oct;10(5):330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
2
Prospective assessment of deep inspiration breath-hold using 3-dimensional surface tracking for irradiation of left-sided breast cancer.使用三维表面追踪对左侧乳腺癌放疗进行深吸气屏气的前瞻性评估。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Nov-Dec;5(6):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
3
Deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer: various aspects of clinical utility.深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术在左侧乳腺癌中的应用:临床实用性的各个方面。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 May 13;16(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01816-3.
4
Abdominal DIBH reduces the cardiac dose even further: a prospective analysis.腹部 DIBH 进一步降低心脏剂量:一项前瞻性分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun 22;13(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1062-6.
5
Cardiac dose reduction using deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) in radiation treatment of left sided breast cancer patients with breast conservation surgery and modified radical mastectomy.使用深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术降低左侧乳腺癌保乳手术和改良根治性乳房切除术患者的心脏剂量。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;52(1):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
The benefit of deep inspiration breath hold: evaluating cardiac radiation exposure in patients after mastectomy and after breast-conserving surgery.深吸气屏气的益处:评估乳房切除术后及保乳手术后患者的心脏辐射暴露情况。
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0676-5. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Radiation effect on late cardiopulmonary toxicity: An analysis comparing supine DIBH versus prone techniques for breast treatment.辐射对迟发性心肺毒性的影响:仰卧位 DIBH 与俯卧位技术治疗乳腺癌的比较分析。
Breast J. 2020 May;26(5):897-903. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13742. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
How dose sparing of cardiac structures correlates with in-field heart volume and sternal displacement.心脏结构的保留如何与野内心脏体积和胸骨移位相关。 (注:原句中dose应为does)
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):60-68. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6324.
9
How Effective is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Minimizing Cardiac Doses During Hybrid Radiotherapy Treatment for Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Comprehensive Regional Nodes?深度吸气屏气在左侧乳腺癌伴综合区域淋巴结放疗中的心脏剂量减影效果如何?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):3301-3310. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3301.
10
Cardiac dose reduction during tangential breast irradiation using deep inspiration breath hold: a dose comparison study based on deformable image registration.使用深吸气屏气技术在乳腺癌切线照射时降低心脏剂量:基于可变形图像配准的剂量比较研究
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Dec 30;10:264. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0573-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic cardiac changes in low cardiovascular risk patients with triple negative breast cancer treated with chemo-immunotherapy.接受化疗免疫治疗的三阴性乳腺癌低心血管风险患者的动态心脏变化
Cardiooncology. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40959-025-00361-2.
2
Radiation-induced heart disease in breast cancer patients: a narrative review of epidemiology, risk factors, radiotherapy parameters, and prevention.乳腺癌患者的放射性心脏病:关于流行病学、危险因素、放疗参数及预防的叙述性综述
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Apr;201(4):368-382. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02362-z. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Comparative analysis of dosimetry and predictive somatotype parameters of prone and supine whole-breast irradiation among Chinese women after breast-conserving surgery.
中国女性保乳术后俯卧位与仰卧位全乳照射的剂量学及预测体型参数的对比分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 17;12:1011805. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1011805. eCollection 2022.
4
Dosimetric Comparisons of Simulation Techniques for Left-Sided Breast Cancer in the COVID-19 Era: Techniques to Reduce Viral Transmission and Respect the Therapeutic Ratio.COVID-19 时代左侧乳腺癌模拟技术的剂量学比较:降低病毒传播并兼顾治疗比的技术
Cureus. 2021 Feb 15;13(2):e13354. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13354.
5
Concerns for Active Breathing Control (ABC) With Breast Cancer in the Era of COVID-19: Maximizing Infection Control While Minimizing Heart Dose.新冠疫情时代乳腺癌主动呼吸控制(ABC)的相关问题:在将心脏剂量降至最低的同时最大限度地控制感染。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):573-574. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.03.009. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.