Deakin University, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102191. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102191. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
A translational trial evaluated the effectiveness of screening for inhibited childhood temperament, followed by a preventive parenting program -Cool Little Kids. This study determined the cost-effectiveness from societal and health sector perspectives using trial data.
Resources to deliver the screening and parenting sessions were determined from study records. Parents completed a questionnaire reporting resources used at one-year follow-up. Standard Australian unit costs were applied. Clinical outcomes for children and parental quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
Total societal costs were lower, but non-significant for the intervention compared to the control group (mean difference -$500 p = 0.937). Total health sector costs were significantly greater (mean difference $1,956; p = 0.015). The intervention led to significantly fewer internalising symptoms (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)-emotional difficulties adjusted mean difference -0.5; p = 0.006), fewer children with SDQ-emotional symptoms in the abnormal range (24.2 % vs. 33.0 % p = .014) and fewer with diagnosed anxiety (44.2 % vs. 50.2 % p = 0.427). From the societal perspective, the intervention would likely be cost-effective. Health sector ICERs were $1,171/SDQ-emotional symptom decrease, $51/abnormal SDQ avoided and $77/anxiety case avoided.
This economic analysis alongside an implementation study provides an early indication that Cool Little Kids may be cost-effective.
一项转化试验评估了筛查儿童抑制性气质,然后进行预防养育计划——“冷静的小家伙”的有效性。本研究从社会和卫生部门的角度,利用试验数据确定了成本效益。
从研究记录中确定了提供筛查和养育课程的资源。父母在一年随访时完成了一份报告资源使用情况的问卷。应用了标准的澳大利亚单位成本。儿童的临床结果和父母的质量调整生命年(QALY)用于计算增量成本效益比(ICER)。
与对照组相比,干预组的总社会成本较低,但无统计学意义(平均差异-500 美元,p=0.937)。总卫生部门成本显著增加(平均差异 1956 美元,p=0.015)。干预导致内部症状显著减少(优势和困难问卷(SDQ)-情绪困难调整平均差异-0.5,p=0.006),SDQ-情绪症状异常范围的儿童减少(24.2%对 33.0%,p=0.014),诊断出焦虑的儿童减少(44.2%对 50.2%,p=0.427)。从社会角度来看,该干预措施可能具有成本效益。从社会角度来看,卫生部门的 ICER 分别为 SDQ 情绪症状减少 1171 美元/项、避免 SDQ 异常 51 美元/项和避免焦虑 77 美元/例。
这项经济分析结合实施研究提供了早期迹象,表明“冷静的小家伙”可能具有成本效益。