机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术在高危局限性前列腺癌中的作用。
The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk organ-confined prostate cancer.
作者信息
Salkini Mohamad Waseem
机构信息
Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
出版信息
Urol Ann. 2020 Jan-Mar;12(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_135_19. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
Abstract
The traditional open retropubic radical prostatectomy has an established role in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, it is well known to be morbid procedure with high complication rate. This bad reputation prevented utilizing it on a large scale for high risk prostate cancer. Utilizing the da Vinci to preform radical prostatectomy decreased the morbidity of the procedure. Since the introduction of robotic prostatectomy, there have been hot debates on its role in the treatment of high risk disease. In this article we reviewed the current evidence on utilizing the surgical system in treating high risk organ confined prostate cancer.
摘要
传统的耻骨后开放性根治性前列腺切除术在前列腺癌治疗中具有既定作用。然而，众所周知，该手术是一种具有高并发症发生率的病态手术。这种不良声誉阻碍了其在高危前列腺癌治疗中的大规模应用。使用达芬奇机器人进行根治性前列腺切除术降低了手术的发病率。自机器人前列腺切除术引入以来，关于其在高危疾病治疗中的作用一直存在激烈争论。在本文中，我们回顾了关于使用该手术系统治疗高危局限性器官前列腺癌的现有证据。
相似文献
1
The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk organ-confined prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术在高危局限性前列腺癌中的作用。
Urol Ann. 2020 Jan-Mar;12(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_135_19. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
2
3
Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.经腹腔镜前列腺切除术机器人开放试验：开放耻骨后和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的勃起功能和肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术手术时间的预测因素。
Int J Urol. 2017 Aug;24(8):618-623. doi: 10.1111/iju.13393. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术：疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较：一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.手术技术在根治性前列腺切除术中对盆腔淋巴结清扫操作的应用及影响：来自共享平等准入区域癌症医院数据库的结果
Int J Urol. 2016 Mar;23(3):241-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.13027. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
8
Extended vs standard lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a propensity-score-matching analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗中高危前列腺癌的扩展与标准淋巴结清扫术：倾向评分匹配分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):216-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11765.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy: A phase 1 clinical study.机器人辅助单孔根治性前列腺切除术：一项1期临床研究。
Int J Urol. 2019 Sep;26(9):878-883. doi: 10.1111/iju.14044. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较：一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
引用本文的文献
1
Da Vinci vs. Hugo RAS for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative single-center study.达芬奇机器人与 Hugo RAS 系统行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的前瞻性对比单中心研究。
World J Urol. 2024 May 18;42(1):336. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05045-7.
2
COVID-19 model-based practice changes in managing a large prostate cancer practice: following the trends during a month-long ordeal.基于 COVID-19 模型的实践变化在管理大型前列腺癌实践中的应用：在一个月的磨难中跟踪趋势。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):251-258. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01100-8. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术、肿瘤学及功能结局比较
Turk J Urol. 2019 Nov 1;45(6):410-417. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.48457. Print 2019 Nov.
2
Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.临床局限性前列腺癌中机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放根治性前列腺切除术：围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15770. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015770.
3
Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer.对于接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗侵袭性前列腺癌的老年男性，无垫控尿功能的恢复与年轻男性无差异。
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):351-360. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02797-5. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床高危前列腺癌患者的长期癌症控制结果：来自 1100 例患者的多机构研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
5
The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术在高危前列腺癌治疗中的作用：系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):918-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 18.
6
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术：疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
7
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: 5-year oncological and biochemical outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术：5 年肿瘤学和生化结局。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析报告机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后疗效的研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
10
Percentage of positive biopsy cores: a better risk stratification model for prostate cancer?阳性活检核心的百分比：前列腺癌更好的风险分层模型？
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):1141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.043. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
Zotero 插件