The Pursuit of Originality Makes Us All the Same!
作者信息
Sogi G M
机构信息
Editor-In-Chief,Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. E-mail:
出版信息
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_410_19.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Pursuit of Originality Makes Us All the Same!对原创性的追求让我们变得千篇一律！
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_410_19.
2
Originality and the PhD: what is it and how can it be demonstrated?原创性与博士学位：它是什么以及如何证明？
Nurse Res. 2015 Jul;22(6):11-5. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.6.11.e1335.
3
Visual motion integration for perception and pursuit.用于感知和追踪的视觉运动整合。
Perception. 2000;29(7):771-87. doi: 10.1068/p2979.
4
Participation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in human originality.左额下回在人类原创性中的参与。
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 Jan;223(1):329-341. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1500-5. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
5
Is this a "Fettecke" or just a "greasy corner"? About the capability of laypersons to differentiate between art and non-art via object's originality.这是一个“脂肪斑”还是仅仅是一个“油腻角落”？关于外行人通过物体的原创性来区分艺术与非艺术的能力。
Iperception. 2014 Nov 28;5(7):602-10. doi: 10.1068/i0664. eCollection 2014.
6
Consensus Matching Pursuit for multi-trial EEG signals.用于多试验脑电信号的一致性匹配追踪算法
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 May 30;180(1):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
7
A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality.作为衡量原创性标准的统计稀有性与主观判断的比较。
J Pers Assess. 1979 Jun;43(3):297-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4303_13.
8
You may be more original than you think: Predictable biases in self-assessment of originality.你可能比自己想象的更具原创性：原创性自我评估中的可预测偏差。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Feb;203:103002. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.103002. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
The origins of originality: the neural bases of creative thinking and originality.原创性的起源：创造性思维和原创性的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.020. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
10
Object motion perception is shaped by the motor control mechanism of ocular pursuit.物体运动感知受眼球追踪的运动控制机制影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(3):350-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1306-3. Epub 2002 Nov 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Importance of Ethical Publishing in Developing Countries.发展中国家道德出版的重要性。
Acta Inform Med. 2012 Mar;20(1):4. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.4-4.
2
Plagiarism in research.研究中的剽窃行为。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Feb;18(1):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9583-8.
3
Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it.科学研究与出版物中的剽窃行为以及如何预防它。
Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr;26(2):141-6. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
4
Principles and ethics in scientific communication in biomedicine.生物医学科学传播中的原则与伦理
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Dec;21(4):228-33. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.228-233. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
5
Conflicts of interest in biomedical publications: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.生物医学出版物中的利益冲突：作者、同行评审人员及编辑应考虑的事项
Croat Med J. 2013 Dec;54(6):600-8. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.600.
6
The importance of proper citation of references in biomedical articles.生物医学文章中正确引用参考文献的重要性。
Acta Inform Med. 2013;21(3):148-55. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.148-155.
7
Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals.生物医学期刊中科学论文的撰写、发表所涉及的伦理问题与困境。
Acta Inform Med. 2012 Sep;20(3):141-8. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.141-148.
8
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (cope).研究机构与期刊在研究诚信案例方面的合作：出版伦理委员会（COPE）的指南
Acta Inform Med. 2012 Sep;20(3):136-40. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.136-140.
9
Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.利润与剽窃：医学代写的案例。
Bioethics. 2010 Jul;24(6):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00705.x. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
10
Plagiarism: what is it, whom does it offend, and how does one deal with it?剽窃：它是什么，它冒犯了谁，以及如何应对它？
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Sep;161(3):479-84. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.3.8352091.
Zotero 插件