Wager Elizabeth, Kleinert Sabine
Publications Consultant, Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK.
Acta Inform Med. 2012 Sep;20(3):136-40. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.20.136-140.
Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations. Institutions should: have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominently; inform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of work that they have published; respond to journals if they request information about issues, such as disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of published work; initiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journals; have policies supporting responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct.Journals should: publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrity; inform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concerns; cooperate with investigations and respond to institutions' questions about misconduct allegations; be prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COP E guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigations; have policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.
机构和期刊在研究与出版不当行为方面都负有重要职责。机构负责其研究人员的行为,并致力于营造健康的研究环境。期刊负责其编辑的行为,维护研究记录,并确保所发表的一切内容的可靠性。因此,机构和期刊就研究诚信相关案例进行有效沟通与合作非常重要。为实现这一点,我们提出以下建议。机构应:设有研究诚信官员(或办公室)并显著公布其联系方式;就已证实的不当行为案例通知期刊,这些不当行为影响其已发表作品的可靠性或归属;如果期刊索要有关可能影响已发表作品可靠性的问题信息,如争议作者身份、误导性报告、利益冲突或其他因素(包括诚实错误),应予以回应;对期刊提出的研究不当行为或不可接受的出版行为指控展开调查;制定支持负责任研究行为的政策,并建立调查涉嫌研究不当行为的体系。期刊应:公布主编的联系方式,主编应作为与研究和出版诚信相关问题的联系人;如果怀疑其研究人员存在不当行为,通知机构并提供支持这些疑虑的证据;配合调查并回应机构关于不当行为指控的问题;在收到调查得出的不当行为调查结果时,准备好(根据COPE撤回指南)发布撤回声明或勘误;制定针对调查研究不当行为案例的机构和其他组织的应对政策。