• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诱导性焦虑和特质焦虑对情绪冲突序列调节的影响。

The effects of induced and trait anxiety on the sequential modulation of emotional conflict.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Psychology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):618-633. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01289-1. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01289-1
PMID:32016501
Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate whether induced anxiety, as well as trait anxiety, would lead to the failure of the regulation of emotional conflict. To measure the regulation of emotional conflict, the congruency sequence effect (CSE), which is a reduced effect of task-irrelevant distractor after incongruent trials compared to congruent trials, was observed while participants performed an emotional conflict task. In Experiment 1, participants performed the task in a safe context and a threatening context where a couple of electric shocks were given randomly on two consecutive days. In Experiment 2, participants performed the same task in either a safe or threatening context to avoid a potential carryover effect of the threat. The CSE observed in the safe context disappeared in the threatening context as well as in participants with high-trait anxiety level even without the threat. The findings imply that induced anxiety causes a failure of cognitive control that engenders the CSE in emotional congruency tasks. Moreover, such failure driven by participants' trait anxiety level might be a potential predisposing factor leading to anxiety disorders. Overall, these results suggest that induced anxiety, as well as trait anxiety, has an adverse impact on the sequential modulation of emotional conflict.

摘要

本研究旨在探究诱发焦虑以及特质焦虑是否会导致情绪冲突调节失败。为了测量情绪冲突的调节,观察了情绪冲突任务中同时呈现的无关分心物的一致性序列效应(CSE),即在不一致试次条件下,无关分心物的影响小于一致试次条件下的影响。在实验 1 中,参与者在安全和威胁两种情境下完成任务,其中在连续两天的时间里,会随机给予参与者几次电击。在实验 2 中,参与者在安全或威胁情境下完成相同的任务,以避免威胁的潜在延续效应。在安全情境下观察到的 CSE 在威胁情境下以及在高特质焦虑水平的参与者中消失了,即使没有威胁。这些发现表明,诱发焦虑会导致认知控制失败,从而导致情绪一致任务中的 CSE。此外,参与者特质焦虑水平驱动的这种失败可能是导致焦虑障碍的潜在易感因素。总体而言,这些结果表明,诱发焦虑和特质焦虑都会对情绪冲突的序列调节产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
The effects of induced and trait anxiety on the sequential modulation of emotional conflict.诱导性焦虑和特质焦虑对情绪冲突序列调节的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):618-633. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01289-1. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Proactive and reactive control during emotional interference and its relationship to trait anxiety.情绪干扰时的主动和被动控制及其与特质焦虑的关系。
Brain Res. 2012 Oct 24;1481:13-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.045. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
3
Mood states influence cognitive control: the case of conflict adaptation.情绪状态影响认知控制:冲突适应的案例。
Psychol Res. 2015 Sep;79(5):759-72. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0602-4. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
4
Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation.连续一致性效应:区分启动和冲突适应。
Psychol Res. 2012 Sep;76(5):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0360-5. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
5
Trait anxiety and dynamic adjustments in conflict processing.特质焦虑与冲突处理中的动态调整。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Sep;10(3):372-81. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.3.372.
6
Emotional and Nonemotional Conflict Processing in Pediatric and Adult Anxiety Disorders.儿童及成人焦虑症中的情绪性和非情绪性冲突处理
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2015 Dec;25(10):754-63. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0066. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Impaired conflict adaptation in an emotional task context following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesions in humans.人类前额扣带回皮质前部损伤后,在情绪任务情境中冲突适应受损。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Oct;24(10):2070-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00266. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
8
Adding fear to conflict: a general purpose cognitive control network is modulated by trait anxiety.增加恐惧冲突:特质焦虑调节通用认知控制网络。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Sep;10(3):357-71. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.3.357.
9
Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.将干扰项转变为目标会增强一致性序列效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
10
Emotional interference during conflict resolution depends on task context.在解决冲突时,情绪干扰取决于任务背景。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Aug;34(5):920-934. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1701417. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of threat of shock-induced anxiety on alerting, orienting, and executive function in women: an ERP study.震惊诱发焦虑对女性警觉、定向和执行功能的影响:一项 ERP 研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Dec;23(6):1513-1533. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01133-0. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Stimulus-Response Conflict Tasks and Their Use in Clinical Psychology.**刺激-反应冲突任务及其在临床心理学中的应用**。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010657.

本文引用的文献

1
Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.多重并发冲突下的连续冲突解决:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuroimage. 2019 Mar;188:411-418. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.031. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
2
State anxiety carried over from prior threat increases late positive potential amplitude during an instructed emotion regulation task.先前威胁遗留的状态焦虑会在一项指导性情绪调节任务中增加晚期正电位的幅度。
Emotion. 2016 Aug;16(5):719-729. doi: 10.1037/emo0000154. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?
一致性序列效应与先前反应时间:冲突适应还是时间学习?
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):590-607. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0681-x. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
4
Effect of trait anxiety on prefrontal control mechanisms during emotional conflict.特质焦虑对情绪冲突期间前额叶控制机制的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jun;36(6):2207-14. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22765. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
5
Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.无学习和记忆混淆的一致性序列效应的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2022-2037. doi: 10.1037/a0037454. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.无特征整合或偶然性学习混淆因素的一致性序列效应
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102337. eCollection 2014.
7
Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning.无特征整合和偶然性学习的一致性序列效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
8
Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.消失,消失,消失了?主动控制可防止一致性序列效应迅速衰退。
Psychol Res. 2014 Jul;78(4):483-93. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0498-4.
9
The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies.焦虑对认知的影响:来自人类电击威胁研究的观点。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 17;7:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00203. eCollection 2013.
10
Comparing electric shock and a fearful screaming face as unconditioned stimuli for fear learning.将电击和可怕的尖叫面孔作为条件刺激物比较,以学习恐惧。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Dec;86(3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 21.