**刺激-反应冲突任务及其在临床心理学中的应用**。
Stimulus-Response Conflict Tasks and Their Use in Clinical Psychology.
机构信息
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Ardeystrasse 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany.
出版信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010657.
Abstract
This article reviews the historical usage of the concept of 'conflict' in psychology and delineates the design and development of three basic conflict tasks (Stroop, Flanker, Stop Signal). Afterwards, important theoretical concepts to account for conflict processing are introduced. In the second part, the usage of these tasks in clinical psychology is considered. The article closes with some reflections regarding factors that may have been hitherto largely neglected in this respect.
摘要
本文回顾了心理学中“冲突”概念的历史用法，并描述了三种基本冲突任务（Stroop、Flanker、Stop Signal）的设计和开发。随后，介绍了用于解释冲突处理的重要理论概念。第二部分考虑了这些任务在临床心理学中的应用。文章最后对一些因素进行了反思，这些因素在这方面可能迄今为止在很大程度上被忽视了。
相似文献
1
Stimulus-Response Conflict Tasks and Their Use in Clinical Psychology.**刺激-反应冲突任务及其在临床心理学中的应用**。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010657.
2
A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.用于冲突任务的修正扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):1-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02288-0. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation.无意识触发的冲突适应。
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 9;5(7):e11508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011508.
4
Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.在冲突任务中，策略和处理速度会掩盖控制能力的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(10):1448-1469. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001028. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
List-level control in the flanker task.在侧抑制任务中的层级控制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1444-1459. doi: 10.1177/1747021820912477. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
6
[Features of the conflict adaptation effect in mild cognitive decline.].[轻度认知功能减退中冲突适应效应的特征。]
Adv Gerontol. 2020;33(5):996-1001.
7
Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.冲突频率影响侧翼干扰：刺激集合特定练习和侧翼反应偶联的作用。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):206-17. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.206.
8
Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.认知控制中的普遍性与特异性：选择性注意任务内部及之间的冲突适应，但选择性注意任务与西蒙任务之间不存在冲突适应。
Psychol Res. 2015 Jan;79(1):143-62. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0540-1. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
9
The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.一致性序列效应3.0：冲突适应的关键测试
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110462. eCollection 2014.
10
Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions.冲突任务中的自动与受控刺激处理：叠加扩散过程与δ函数
Cogn Psychol. 2015 May;78:148-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
引用本文的文献
1
Inhibitory dynamics in dual-route evidence accumulation account for response time distributions from conflict tasks.双路径证据积累中的抑制动力学解释了冲突任务的反应时间分布。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Aug;18(4):1507-1524. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-09990-8. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Action-rule-based cognitive control enables efficient execution of stimulus-response conflict tasks: a model validation of Simon task performance.基于动作规则的认知控制能够有效执行刺激-反应冲突任务：西蒙任务表现的模型验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Nov 16;17:1239207. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239207. eCollection 2023.
本文引用的文献
1
Cognitive Capacity, Representation, and Instruction.认知能力、表征与教学
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:701687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701687. eCollection 2021.
2
Attentional biases towards food and body stimuli among individuals with disordered eating versus food allergies.注意偏向食物和身体刺激在饮食失调个体与食物过敏个体中的差异。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;73:101657. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2021.101657. Epub 2021 May 6.
3
Attention control ability, mood state, and emotional regulation ability partially affect executive control of attention on task-irrelevant emotional stimuli.注意控制能力、情绪状态和情绪调节能力部分影响对任务无关情绪刺激的执行注意控制。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Oct;210:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103169. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
The effects of induced and trait anxiety on the sequential modulation of emotional conflict.诱导性焦虑和特质焦虑对情绪冲突序列调节的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):618-633. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01289-1. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.冲突监测与情感信号假说——综合述评。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):193-216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9.
6
The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses.手动和语音反应的斯特鲁普干扰与促进效应的位点
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 19;10:1786. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01786. eCollection 2019.
7
Attention control and its emotion-specific association with cognitive emotion regulation in depression.注意控制及其与抑郁症认知情绪调节的情绪特异性关联。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Dec;13(6):1766-1779. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00174-9.
8
Affect and cognitive control: Insights from research on effort mobilization.情绪与认知控制：努力调动研究的新视角。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Sep;143:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.在停止信号任务中捕捉抑制动作和冲动行为能力的共识指南。
Elife. 2019 Apr 29;8:e46323. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46323.
10
Characterizing emotional Stroop interference in posttraumatic stress disorder, major depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.描述创伤后应激障碍、重度抑郁症和焦虑障碍中的情绪 Stroop 干扰：系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 9;14(4):e0214998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214998. eCollection 2019.
Zotero 插件