Bitter Neis, Roeg Diana, van Nieuwenhuizen Chijs, van Weeghel Jaap
Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
GGzE Institute for Mental Health Care, PO Box 909, 5600, AX, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Aug;56(6):1053-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00561-3. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Research on the recovery domains beside clinical recovery of people with severe mental illness in need of supported accommodations is limited. The aim of this study was (1) to investigate which recovery interventions exist for this group of people and (2) to explore the scientific evidence. We conducted a scoping review, including studies with different designs, evaluating the effectiveness the recovery interventions available. The search resulted in 53 eligible articles of which 22 focused on societal recovery, six on personal recovery, five on functional recovery, 13 on lifestyle-interventions, and seven on creative and spiritual interventions. About a quarter of these interventions showed added value and half of them initial promising results. The research in this area is still limited, but a number of recovery promoting interventions on other areas than clinical recovery have been developed and evaluated. Further innovation and research to strengthen and repeat the evidence are needed.
对于需要支持性住所的严重精神疾病患者，除临床康复之外的康复领域研究有限。本研究的目的是：（1）调查针对这类人群存在哪些康复干预措施；（2）探索科学证据。我们进行了一项范围综述，纳入了不同设计的研究，以评估现有康复干预措施的有效性。检索结果得到53篇符合条件的文章，其中22篇关注社会康复，6篇关注个人康复，5篇关注功能康复，13篇关注生活方式干预，7篇关注创造性和精神性干预。这些干预措施中约四分之一显示出附加值，一半显示出初步的积极结果。该领域的研究仍然有限，但已开发并评估了一些除临床康复之外其他领域的促进康复干预措施。需要进一步创新和研究以加强并重复相关证据。
