Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Urology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Japan.
Prostate. 2020 Apr;80(5):432-440. doi: 10.1002/pros.23958. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Recent landmark randomized trials (CHAARTED and LATITUDE studies) have highlighted potent upfront therapy for "high-volume" and "high-risk" metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer (mCNPC). However, treatment response shows racial differences. We aimed to propose a novel definition for "high-volume" prostate cancer in Asians.
We retrospectively pursued 426 patients with de novo mCNPC from multiple institutions between 1999 and 2017. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy alone as initial treatment. We evaluated the number of bone metastases at diagnosis to clarify the clinical significance for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan-Meier methods.
Median age and prostate-specific antigen level were 73 years and 266.2 ng/ml, respectively. Median OS was 55.5 months in patients who met the CHAARTED high criteria (vs 33.1 months in the trial). We evaluated 5 thresholds in the number of bone metastases (≥4, ≥6, ≥11, ≥16, and ≥21) to investigate the prognostic values. Patients with ≥11 bone metastases showed the highest HR for OS (2.766). Patients with 11 to 20 bone metastases had a significantly shorter OS than those with ≤10 metastases (P = .0001). We, therefore, proposed modified CHAARTED and LATITUDE high criteria (extending bone metastases ≥11). In multivariate analysis, the modified criteria were the only independent prognostic factors for OS (P = .0272 and P = .042, respectively). Conversely, no significant differences in OS were seen between patients with 1 to 3 bone metastases and 4 to 10 (P = .7513).
Our exploratory study suggested ≥11 bone metastases as a suitable definition for "high-volume" prostate cancer in Asians. A larger, prospective study is warranted to verify our findings.
最近的几项具有里程碑意义的随机试验(CHAARTED 和 LATITUDE 研究)强调了针对“高容量”和“高危”转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌(mCNPC)的有效一线治疗。然而,治疗反应存在种族差异。我们旨在为亚洲人群提出一种新的“高容量”前列腺癌定义。
我们回顾性地研究了 1999 年至 2017 年间来自多个机构的 426 例初发 mCNPC 患者。所有患者均接受单独的雄激素剥夺治疗作为初始治疗。我们评估了诊断时骨转移的数量,以明确其对无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)的临床意义。统计分析采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Cox 比例风险模型和 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行。
中位年龄和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平分别为 73 岁和 266.2ng/ml。符合 CHAARTED 高危标准的患者中位 OS 为 55.5 个月(而试验中的中位 OS 为 33.1 个月)。我们评估了骨转移数量(≥4、≥6、≥11、≥16 和≥21)的 5 个阈值,以研究其预后价值。骨转移≥11 个的患者 OS 风险最高(HR 为 2.766)。骨转移 11 至 20 个的患者 OS 明显短于骨转移≤10 个的患者(P=0.0001)。因此,我们提出了改良的 CHAARTED 和 LATITUDE 高危标准(骨转移扩展至≥11)。多变量分析显示,改良标准是 OS 的唯一独立预后因素(P=0.0272 和 P=0.042)。相反,骨转移 1 至 3 个和 4 至 10 个的患者 OS 无显著差异(P=0.7513)。
我们的探索性研究表明,骨转移≥11 个是亚洲人群“高容量”前列腺癌的合适定义。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证我们的发现。