Pulmonary Division, Rabin Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Clin Transplant. 2020 Mar;34(3):e13811. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13811. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LTRs.
During a 6-month period, all bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (including post-transplant surveillance) obtained from LTRs at our center were routinely tested for Aspergillus PCR, galactomannan (GM), and fungal culture. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was defined using EORTC/MSG and ISHLT criteria for proven and probable aspergillosis.
Ninety-five consecutive BAL samples were tested. PCR, GM, and fungal culture were positive in 28.4%, 30.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Five cases of IA (two proven, three probable) were identified. Fungal culture failed to detect 40% of IA cases, which were detected by a positive PCR and/or GM. However, the majority of positive PCR samples represented colonization (59.3%). Sensitivity of PCR, GM, and culture for IA was 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, and specificity was 74%, 71%, and 96%.
In LTRs, a routine prospectively employed screening strategy in which all BAL samples were screened for Aspergillus PCR and GM, detected aspergillosis cases that were otherwise missed by a false-negative fungal culture, but resulted in more cases of colonization being detected. Clinical judgment is thus warranted to avoid unnecessary treatment of colonization.
侵袭性曲霉病是肺移植受者(LTR)发病率和死亡率的重要原因。早期诊断可能改善预后,但具有挑战性。我们评估了常规、全面、前瞻性应用的曲霉筛查策略在 LTR 中的诊断效果。
在 6 个月期间,对我院所有 LTR 的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)样本(包括移植后监测)进行常规曲霉 PCR、半乳甘露聚糖(GM)和真菌培养检测。采用 EORTC/MSG 和 ISHLT 侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的诊断标准,对确诊和可能的曲霉病进行定义。
共检测了 95 例连续 BAL 样本。PCR、GM 和真菌培养的阳性率分别为 28.4%、30.6%和 7.4%。发现 5 例 IA(2 例确诊,3 例可能)。真菌培养未能检测到 40%的 IA 病例,这些病例通过阳性 PCR 和/或 GM 检测到。然而,大多数阳性 PCR 样本代表定植(59.3%)。PCR、GM 和培养对 IA 的敏感性分别为 80%、60%和 60%,特异性分别为 74%、71%和 96%。
在 LTR 中,常规前瞻性应用的筛查策略中,所有 BAL 样本均进行了曲霉 PCR 和 GM 检测,发现了真菌培养假阴性而漏诊的曲霉病病例,但导致更多的定植病例被检出。因此,需要临床判断以避免对定植进行不必要的治疗。