Suppr超能文献

对肺移植受者支气管肺泡灌洗液样本进行常规的全面曲霉菌筛查。

Routine comprehensive Aspergillus screening of bronchoalveolar lavage samples in lung transplant recipients.

机构信息

Pulmonary Division, Rabin Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel.

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2020 Mar;34(3):e13811. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13811. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Early diagnosis may improve outcome, yet is challenging. We assessed the diagnostic yield of a routine, comprehensive, prospectively employed Aspergillus screening strategy in LTRs.

METHODS

During a 6-month period, all bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (including post-transplant surveillance) obtained from LTRs at our center were routinely tested for Aspergillus PCR, galactomannan (GM), and fungal culture. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was defined using EORTC/MSG and ISHLT criteria for proven and probable aspergillosis.

RESULTS

Ninety-five consecutive BAL samples were tested. PCR, GM, and fungal culture were positive in 28.4%, 30.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. Five cases of IA (two proven, three probable) were identified. Fungal culture failed to detect 40% of IA cases, which were detected by a positive PCR and/or GM. However, the majority of positive PCR samples represented colonization (59.3%). Sensitivity of PCR, GM, and culture for IA was 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, and specificity was 74%, 71%, and 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

In LTRs, a routine prospectively employed screening strategy in which all BAL samples were screened for Aspergillus PCR and GM, detected aspergillosis cases that were otherwise missed by a false-negative fungal culture, but resulted in more cases of colonization being detected. Clinical judgment is thus warranted to avoid unnecessary treatment of colonization.

摘要

背景

侵袭性曲霉病是肺移植受者(LTR)发病率和死亡率的重要原因。早期诊断可能改善预后,但具有挑战性。我们评估了常规、全面、前瞻性应用的曲霉筛查策略在 LTR 中的诊断效果。

方法

在 6 个月期间,对我院所有 LTR 的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)样本(包括移植后监测)进行常规曲霉 PCR、半乳甘露聚糖(GM)和真菌培养检测。采用 EORTC/MSG 和 ISHLT 侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的诊断标准,对确诊和可能的曲霉病进行定义。

结果

共检测了 95 例连续 BAL 样本。PCR、GM 和真菌培养的阳性率分别为 28.4%、30.6%和 7.4%。发现 5 例 IA(2 例确诊,3 例可能)。真菌培养未能检测到 40%的 IA 病例,这些病例通过阳性 PCR 和/或 GM 检测到。然而,大多数阳性 PCR 样本代表定植(59.3%)。PCR、GM 和培养对 IA 的敏感性分别为 80%、60%和 60%,特异性分别为 74%、71%和 96%。

结论

在 LTR 中,常规前瞻性应用的筛查策略中,所有 BAL 样本均进行了曲霉 PCR 和 GM 检测,发现了真菌培养假阴性而漏诊的曲霉病病例,但导致更多的定植病例被检出。因此,需要临床判断以避免对定植进行不必要的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验