Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Fungal Profile Plus Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Pulmonary Infections.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary infections due to , Mucorales, and have high morbidity and mortality, in part due to diagnostic challenges. Commercially available molecular assays on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) may have increased sensitivity over currently available diagnostic options. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic performance of assays for each of these pathogens in our patient population.

METHODS

The medical records of patients whose BALF was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for , Mucorales, and between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed in a cross-sectional manner. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions of "proven," "probable," and "possible" infection were used, including histopathology, serology, and culture. We used (1) "proven" or "probable" infection by EORTC criteria, (2) improvement or stabilization on targeted antimicrobial therapy, and (3) absence of a more likely diagnosis as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The PCR assay demonstrated the highest agreement with the diagnostic reference standard, with 31.25% (10/32) sensitivity and 97.17% (206/212) specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 62.50% (10/16) and 90.35% (206/228), respectively. No Mucorales or infections were identified by the diagnostic reference standard, so the sensitivity could not be calculated. The specificity of Mucorales and targets was 98.35% and 96.69%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated relatively poor clinical sensitivity for all 3 constituent PCR assays in our patient population, suggesting a limited role for this test in the diagnosis of , Mucorales, or .