• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Coping styles associated with glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制相关的应对方式。
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Sep;11(5):1215-1221. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13225. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
2
Family function, stress, and locus of control. Relationships to glycemia in adults with diabetes mellitus.家庭功能、压力与控制点。与成年糖尿病患者血糖水平的关系。
Arch Fam Med. 1993 Apr;2(4):393-402. doi: 10.1001/archfami.2.4.393.
3
How does anger coping style affect glycemic control in diabetes patients?愤怒应对方式如何影响糖尿病患者的血糖控制?
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):167-72. doi: 10.1080/10705500802219481.
4
Impacts of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake on glycemic control in patients with diabetes.2016 年熊本地震对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Mar;10(2):521-530. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12891. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Associations of Coping Strategies With Glycemic and Psychosocial Outcomes Among Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Experiencing Diabetes Distress.青少年 1 型糖尿病患者经历糖尿病困扰时,应对策略与血糖和心理社会结局的相关性。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Aug 7;58(9):628-633. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae028.
6
A longitudinal study of coping, anxiety and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病成人的应对方式、焦虑与血糖控制的纵向研究。
Psychol Health. 2008;23(1):73-89. doi: 10.1080/14768320701205218.
7
Relationship Between Psychosocial Factors and Glucose Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.成人 2 型糖尿病患者心理社会因素与血糖控制的关系。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Oct;44(7):636-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
8
Coping skills and glycaemic control: the mediating role of diabetes distress.应对技能与血糖控制:糖尿病困扰的中介作用。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Aug;58(8):1071-1079. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01679-w. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
The relationship between clinical indicators, coping styles, perceived support and diabetes-related distress among adults with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者的临床指标、应对方式、感知支持与糖尿病相关困扰之间的关系。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Feb;68(2):391-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05751.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
10
Twenty-four-hour variations in blood glucose level in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients based on continuous glucose monitoring.基于连续血糖监测的日本 2 型糖尿病患者血糖水平 24 小时变化。
J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Jan;9(1):75-82. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12680. Epub 2017 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients with diabetes and obesity exhibit characteristics in eating and coping behaviors and personality traits.患有糖尿病和肥胖症的患者在饮食、应对行为及性格特征方面表现出一些特点。
Diabetol Int. 2024 Apr 16;15(3):528-534. doi: 10.1007/s13340-024-00721-w. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Coping With Discrimination Among African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes: Factor Structure and Associations With Diabetes Control, Mental Distress, and Psychosocial Resources.非裔美国人 2 型糖尿病患者的歧视应对策略:结构因素及其与糖尿病控制、精神困扰和心理社会资源的关联。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Jan 25;21:E06. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230189.
3
The association of self-efficacy and coping strategies with body mass index is mediated by eating behaviors and dietary intake among young females: A structural-equation modeling approach.自我效能感和应对策略与年轻女性体重指数的相关性可通过饮食行为和饮食摄入来解释:结构方程建模方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0279364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279364. eCollection 2023.
4
Diabetes care and prevention services provided by pharmacists: Progress made during the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for additional efforts in the post-pandemic era.药剂师提供的糖尿病护理与预防服务:COVID-19大流行期间取得的进展以及大流行后时代进一步努力的必要性。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Jun;6:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100137. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
A predictive model incorporating the change detection and Winsorization methods for alerting hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.纳入变化检测和数据取舍方法的预测模型,用于警示低血糖和高血糖。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021 Nov;59(11-12):2311-2324. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02433-8. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
Blood glucose control: Where are we?血糖控制:我们现在处于什么阶段?
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Oct;12(10):1762-1764. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13632. Epub 2021 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing a Dimensional Versus a Typological Approach to the Communal Coping Model in the Context of Type 2 Diabetes.检验 2 型糖尿病背景下共通体应对模型的维度法与类型学法。
Health Commun. 2020 May;35(5):585-596. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1573297. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Well-being interventions for individuals with diabetes: A systematic review.糖尿病患者的幸福感干预措施:系统评价。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jan;147:118-133. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Association between insomnia and coping style in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.日本2型糖尿病患者失眠与应对方式之间的关联。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Jul 10;14:1803-1809. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S168934. eCollection 2018.
4
The common sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model.自我调节的常识模型:过程模型的元分析与检验。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Nov;143(11):1117-1154. doi: 10.1037/bul0000118. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
5
Depressive Symptoms and Coping Behaviors among Individuals with Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Japan.日本肠易激综合征患者的抑郁症状与应对行为
Intern Med. 2017;56(5):493-498. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7695. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for adults for stressful situations in healthy people.成人应对量表日文版在健康人群应激情况下的信度与效度
Psychol Rep. 2015 Apr;116(2):447-69. doi: 10.2466/08.02.PR0.116k23w6. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
7
The evaluation of stress coping styles and type D personality in patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者应激应对方式及D型人格的评估
Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(7):557-66. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0039. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Age and gender differences in the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Japanese working individuals.日本在职人群中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表因子结构的年龄和性别差异。
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56:272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Selected factors determining a way of coping with stress in type 2 diabetic patients.决定2型糖尿病患者应对压力方式的相关因素
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:587823. doi: 10.1155/2014/587823. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
Psychometric evaluation of a coping questionnaire in two independent samples of people with diabetes.应对问卷在两个独立糖尿病患者样本中的心理测量学评估
Stress Health. 2013 Oct;29(4):286-96. doi: 10.1002/smi.2466. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制相关的应对方式。

Coping styles associated with glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Sep;11(5):1215-1221. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13225. Epub 2020 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/jdi.13225
PMID:32017452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7477505/
Abstract

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: Glycemic control varies according to stress level and the efficacy of control measures, affecting the outcomes of diabetes. Although detailed coping styles have not been well studied in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, problem-focused coping strategies are believed to be related to better control of blood glucose. Associations between coping profiles/dimensions and blood glucose control were examined in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The participants included 503 Japanese patients (mean age 63.9 ± 12.6 years) with type 2 diabetes. The average glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were calculated from HbA1c levels measured more than four times within the 12 months before the assessment. Coping profiles were assessed using the Brief Scale for Coping Profile. Lifestyle factors were also included in the analyses.

RESULTS

Factors other than age were not associated with HbA1c levels in patients who used insulin. Conversely, habitual alcohol consumption, single status, the adaptive emotion-focused coping dimension, and changing mood and changing one's point of view profiles were associated with HbA1c levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that adaptive emotion-focused coping supports glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients who do not use insulin. Additional studies using a longitudinal design are required to further examine the relationships between psychological factors and glycemic control.

摘要

目的

血糖控制因应激水平和控制措施的效果而异,从而影响糖尿病的结局。尽管在 2 型糖尿病患者中,详细的应对方式尚未得到充分研究,但人们认为问题焦点应对策略与更好的血糖控制有关。本研究旨在探讨 2 型糖尿病患者的应对方式特征/维度与血糖控制之间的关系。

材料和方法

参与者包括 503 名日本 2 型糖尿病患者(平均年龄 63.9±12.6 岁)。在评估前 12 个月内,通过测量 HbA1c 水平超过 4 次来计算平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。使用简短应对方式量表评估应对方式特征。在分析中还包括生活方式因素。

结果

在使用胰岛素的患者中,除年龄以外的因素与 HbA1c 水平无关。相反,习惯性饮酒、单身状态、适应性情绪焦点应对维度以及改变情绪和改变观点的应对方式特征与 HbA1c 水平相关。

结论

这些发现表明,适应性情绪焦点应对方式有助于不使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。需要使用纵向设计的进一步研究来进一步检查心理因素与血糖控制之间的关系。