Am Nat. 2020 Feb;195(2):E51-E66. doi: 10.1086/706305. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympatric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the innovation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing selection on body size (dragons). Despite this constraining effect in dragons, sympatric gliders exhibit greater size disparity compared with allopatric gliders, a pattern consistent with, although not exclusively explained by, ecological competition changing the adaptive landscape of body size evolution to induce character displacement. These results show that innovations do not necessarily instigate further differentiation among species, as is so often assumed, and suggest that competition can be a powerful force generating morphological divergence among coexisting species, even in the face of strong stabilizing selection.
进化创新和生态竞争通常被认为是适应性多样化的驱动因素。然而,许多创新导致形态上的稳定选择而不是多样化选择,并且共存物种之间的形态差异可以反映竞争排斥(物种分类)而不是同域适应性分歧(特征替换)。我们研究了滑翔在飞龙(Agamidae)和松鼠(Sciuridae)中的创新及其对随后的体型多样化的影响。我们发现滑翔要么没有影响(松鼠),要么导致体型的强烈稳定选择(飞龙)。尽管飞龙受到这种限制,但与异域滑翔相比,同域滑翔者表现出更大的体型差异,这种模式与生态竞争改变体型进化的适应景观以诱导特征替换一致,尽管并非完全可以解释。这些结果表明,创新不一定会像人们通常假设的那样引发物种之间的进一步分化,并表明竞争可以是一种强大的力量,即使在受到强烈稳定选择的情况下,也能在共存物种中产生形态上的分歧。