• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纵向临床推理教学和评估的必要性:一项国际调查的结果。

The need for longitudinal clinical reasoning teaching and assessment: Results of an international survey.

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Medical Education Sciences, Medical School, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2020 Apr;42(4):457-462. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1708293. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1708293
PMID:32017640
Abstract

Clinical reasoning is a key ability essential for practising health professionals. However, little is known about the current global adoption of clinical reasoning teaching and assessment. We aimed to provide insights into how clinical reasoning is deliberately taught and assessed in curricula worldwide and to identify needs and perceived barriers for teaching clinical reasoning to students and educators. A questionnaire was devised by an international expert group and distributed in a large international medical education community. Data were collected in 2018 and analysed using descriptive statistics. We identified themes in free-text responses using content analysis. Three hundred and thirteen responses from 76 countries were collected. Most respondents were from Europe (34%). While the presence of a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum was only reported by 28%, 85% stated that such a curriculum was needed. The lack of awareness of the need to explicitly teach clinical reasoning was the most commonly identified barrier. For assessment, the greatest need identified was for more workplace-based assessment. Global respondents indicate the need to implement explicit longitudinal clinical reasoning curricula. Our findings suggest that efforts should be put into improving faculty development, including evidence-based materials on how to teach and assess clinical reasoning.

摘要

临床推理是执业健康专业人员必备的关键能力。然而,目前对于全球临床推理教学和评估的采用情况知之甚少。我们旨在深入了解全球课程中如何有针对性地教授和评估临床推理,并确定学生和教育者教授临床推理的需求和感知障碍。一个国际专家组设计了一份问卷,并在一个大型国际医学教育社区中进行了分发。2018 年收集了数据,并使用描述性统计进行了分析。我们使用内容分析对自由文本回复中的主题进行了识别。从 76 个国家收集了 313 份回复。大多数受访者来自欧洲(34%)。虽然只有 28%的人报告了存在纵向临床推理课程,但 85%的人表示需要这样的课程。最常被确定的障碍是缺乏明确教授临床推理的意识。在评估方面,最大的需求是更多基于工作场所的评估。全球受访者表示需要实施明确的纵向临床推理课程。我们的研究结果表明,应该努力提高教师的发展,包括关于如何教授和评估临床推理的基于证据的材料。

相似文献

1
The need for longitudinal clinical reasoning teaching and assessment: Results of an international survey.纵向临床推理教学和评估的必要性:一项国际调查的结果。
Med Teach. 2020 Apr;42(4):457-462. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1708293. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators.为什么实施纵向临床推理课程如此困难?一项关于欧洲卫生专业教育者感知障碍的多中心访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 12;21(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02960-w.
3
Current status and ongoing needs for the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning - an international mixed-methods study from the students` and teachers` perspective.当前临床推理教学和评估的现状和需求——基于学生和教师视角的国际混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 5;24(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05518-8.
4
Clinical Reasoning: Survey of Teaching Methods, Integration, and Assessment in Entry-Level Physical Therapist Academic Education.临床推理:入门级物理治疗师学术教育中的教学方法、整合与评估概述
Phys Ther. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):175-186. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150320.
5
Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning.开发欧洲纵向和跨专业临床推理课程。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Feb 20;10(3):218-224. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0103. eCollection 2023 Aug 1.
6
Teaching Students How to Think: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Preclerkship Clinical Reasoning Instruction.教学生如何思考:预科临床推理教学的纵向定性研究。
Mil Med. 2023 May 18;188(Suppl 2):50-55. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad036.
7
Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education.关于本科医学教育中临床推理课程内容的共识声明。
Med Teach. 2021 Feb;43(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
Perspectives on the current state of pre-clerkship clinical reasoning instruction in United States medical schools: a survey of clinical skills course directors.美国医学院校临床实习前临床推理教学现状的观点:对临床技能课程主任的一项调查
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jul 1;9(1):59-68. doi: 10.1515/dx-2021-0016.
9
Educators' perspectives of adopting virtual patient online learning tools to teach clinical reasoning in medical schools: a qualitative study.教育工作者采用虚拟患者在线学习工具在医学院教授临床推理的观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04422-x.
10
Using an experiential learning model to teach clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias: an evaluation of a first-year medical student curriculum.运用体验式学习模型教授临床推理理论和认知偏差:对一年级医学生课程的评估。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2153782. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2153782.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the perception of pre-clinical and clinical educators on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study.探索临床前和临床教育工作者对临床推理的认知:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 21;20(3):e0320220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320220. eCollection 2025.
2
Virtual Patient Simulations Using Social Robotics Combined With Large Language Models for Clinical Reasoning Training in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Study.使用社交机器人结合大语言模型进行医学教育临床推理训练的虚拟患者模拟:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e63312. doi: 10.2196/63312.
3
Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review.
本科医学生临床推理技能的教学与学习:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 16;19(10):e0309606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309606. eCollection 2024.
4
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills for medical students: a qualitative comparison of LLM-powered social robotic versus computer-based virtual patients within rheumatology.提高医学生的临床推理能力:风湿病学领域中基于大语言模型的社交机器人与基于计算机的虚拟患者的定性比较
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Dec;44(12):3041-3051. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05731-0. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
Current status and ongoing needs for the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning - an international mixed-methods study from the students` and teachers` perspective.当前临床推理教学和评估的现状和需求——基于学生和教师视角的国际混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 5;24(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05518-8.
6
Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside.教授临床推理:从文献中汲取的原则,有助于改进从课堂到床边的教学。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Jun;36(2):145-155. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.292. Epub 2024 May 30.
7
Minding the gap: towards a shared clinical reasoning lexicon across the pre-clerkship/clerkship transition.弥合差距:在预科/临床实习过渡阶段建立共同的临床推理词汇
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2307715. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2307715. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
8
Clinical Reasoning Curricula in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.卫生专业教育中的临床推理课程:一项范围综述。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Oct 25;10:23821205231209093. doi: 10.1177/23821205231209093. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Medical education in times of war: a mixed-methods needs analysis at Ukrainian medical schools.战时医学教育:乌克兰医学院的混合方法需求分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04768-2.
10
Clinical reasoning training sessions for health educators-A scoping review.针对健康教育工作者的临床推理培训课程——一项范围综述
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Jun 20;18(6):1480-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.06.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.