Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2153782. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2153782.
Most medical students entering clerkships have limited understanding of clinical reasoning concepts. The value of teaching theories of clinical reasoning and cognitive biases to first-year medical students is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the value of explicitly teaching clinical reasoning theory and cognitive bias to first-year medical students.
Using Kolb's experiential learning model, we introduced dual process theory, script theory, and cognitive biases in teaching clinical reasoning to first-year medical students at an academic medical center in New York City between January and June 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, instruction was transitioned to a distance learning format in March 2020. The curriculum included a series of written clinical reasoning examinations with facilitated small group discussions. Written self-assessments prompted each student to reflect on the experience, draw conclusions about their clinical reasoning, and plan for future encounters involving clinical reasoning. We evaluated the value of the curriculum using mixed-methods to analyze faculty assessments, student self-assessment questionnaires, and an end-of-curriculum anonymous questionnaire eliciting student feedback.
Among 318 total examinations of 106 students, 254 (80%) had a complete problem representation, while 199 (63%) of problem representations were considered concise. The most common cognitive biases described by students in their clinical reasoning were anchoring bias, availability bias, and premature closure. Four major themes emerged as valuable outcomes of the CREs as identified by students: (1) synthesis of medical knowledge; (2) enhanced ability to generate differential diagnoses; (3) development of self-efficacy related to clinical reasoning; (4) raised awareness of personal cognitive biases.
We found that explicitly teaching clinical reasoning theory and cognitive biases using an experiential learning model provides first-year medical students with valuable opportunities for developing knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy related to clinical reasoning.
大多数进入实习阶段的医学生对临床推理概念的理解有限。向医学生教授临床推理理论和认知偏差的价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估向医学生教授临床推理理论和认知偏差的价值。
使用科尔布的体验式学习模型,我们在 2020 年 1 月至 6 月期间向纽约市一所学术医学中心的医学生介绍双过程理论、脚本理论和认知偏差在临床推理教学中的应用。由于 COVID-19 大流行,教学于 2020 年 3 月转为远程学习模式。该课程包括一系列带有小组讨论的书面临床推理考试。书面自我评估促使每位学生反思自己的经验,对自己的临床推理得出结论,并计划未来涉及临床推理的情况。我们使用混合方法评估课程的价值,分析教师评估、学生自我评估问卷以及课程结束时的匿名问卷调查学生反馈。
在 106 名学生的 318 次总考试中,254 次(80%)具有完整的问题表现,而 199 次(63%)的问题表现被认为简洁。学生在临床推理中描述的最常见认知偏差是锚定偏差、可得性偏差和过早闭合。学生认为 CRE 的四个主要有价值的结果是:(1)医学知识的综合;(2)增强生成鉴别诊断的能力;(3)与临床推理相关的自我效能的发展;(4)提高对个人认知偏差的认识。
我们发现,使用体验式学习模型明确教授临床推理理论和认知偏差为医学生提供了宝贵的机会,使他们能够发展与临床推理相关的知识、技能和自我效能。