Medical Education Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Med Teach. 2021 Feb;43(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
Effective clinical reasoning is required for safe patient care. Students and postgraduate trainees largely learn the knowledge, skills and behaviours required for effective clinical reasoning implicitly, through experience and apprenticeship. There is a growing consensus that medical schools should teach clinical reasoning in a way that is explicitly integrated into courses throughout each year, adopting a systematic approach consistent with current evidence. However, the clinical reasoning literature is 'fragmented' and can be difficult for medical educators to access. The purpose of this paper is to provide practical recommendations that will be of use to all medical schools.
Members of the UK Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education group (CReME) met to discuss what clinical reasoning-specific teaching should be delivered by medical schools ( to teach). A literature review was conducted to identify what teaching strategies are successful in improving clinical reasoning ability among medical students ( to teach). A consensus statement was then produced based on the agreed ideas and the literature review, discussed by members of the consensus statement group, then edited and agreed by the authors.
The group identified 30 consensus ideas that were grouped into five domains: (1) clinical reasoning concepts, (2) history and physical examination, (3) choosing and interpreting diagnostic tests, (4) problem identification and management, and (5) shared decision making. The literature review demonstrated a lack of effectiveness for teaching the general thinking processes involved in clinical reasoning, whereas specific teaching strategies aimed at building knowledge and understanding led to improvements. These strategies are synthesised and described.
What is taught, how it is taught, and when it is taught can facilitate clinical reasoning development more effectively through purposeful curriculum design and medical schools should consider implementing a formal clinical reasoning curriculum that is horizontally and vertically integrated throughout the programme.
有效的临床推理对于安全的患者护理至关重要。学生和研究生学员主要通过经验和学徒制来隐性地学习有效的临床推理所需的知识、技能和行为。越来越多的人认为,医学院应该以一种明确的方式教授临床推理,将其系统地整合到整个学年的课程中,采用与当前证据一致的方法。然而,临床推理文献“碎片化”,医学教育工作者难以获取。本文的目的是为所有医学院提供实用的建议。
英国临床推理医学教育组(CReME)的成员开会讨论医学院应该教授哪些特定的临床推理内容(教授什么)。进行文献综述,以确定哪些教学策略在提高医学生临床推理能力方面是成功的(教授什么)。然后根据达成的共识和文献综述,生成一份共识声明,由共识声明小组成员进行讨论,再由作者进行编辑和同意。
该小组确定了 30 个共识意见,这些意见分为五个领域:(1)临床推理概念,(2)病史和体格检查,(3)选择和解释诊断测试,(4)问题识别和管理,以及(5)共同决策。文献综述表明,教授临床推理中涉及的一般思维过程的教学效果不佳,而针对建立知识和理解的具体教学策略则导致了改善。这些策略被综合并描述。
通过有目的的课程设计,教授内容、教学方法和教学时间可以更有效地促进临床推理的发展,医学院应该考虑实施正式的临床推理课程,将其横向和纵向整合到整个课程中。