Welk Blayne, McKibbon Mary
University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jul;14(7):E297-E303. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6142.
We aimed to determine if transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is effective at treating overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms among neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Adult patients were recruited from one of two groups: 1) women with OAB; and 2) patients with neurogenic disease and bladder symptoms. The intervention was stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve, for 30 minutes, three times per week for 12 weeks at home using transcutaneous patch electrodes. The primary outcome was improvement of the patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC). We used ANCOVA (with adjustment for baseline values) and followed the intention-to-treat principle; we reported marginal means (MM) and a p<0.05 was considered significant.
We recruited 50 patients (OAB n=20, neurogenic bladder n=30); 24 were allocated to the sham group and 26 to the active TTNS group. Baseline characteristics in both groups were similar. At the end of the study, there was no significant difference in the PPBC between sham or active groups: 13% (3/24) of sham patients and 15% (4/26) of active TTNS patients were responders (p=0.77), and the MM of the end-of-study PPBC score was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-3.7) vs. 2.9 (95% CI 2.5-3.4), respectively (p=0.30). Similarly, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes (24-hour pad weight, voiding diary parameters, or condition-specific patient-reported outcomes). The results were similar within the OAB and neurogenic bladder subgroups.
TTNS does not appear to be effective for treating urinary symptoms of people with OAB or neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
我们旨在确定经皮胫神经刺激(TTNS)在治疗神经源性和非神经源性患者膀胱过度活动症(OAB)症状方面是否有效。
我们进行了一项随机、双盲、假对照研究。成年患者从以下两组中招募:1)患有OAB的女性;2)患有神经源性疾病和膀胱症状的患者。干预措施是使用经皮贴片电极在家中刺激胫后神经,每次30分钟,每周三次,共12周。主要结局是患者对膀胱状况感知的改善(PPBC)。我们使用协方差分析(对基线值进行调整)并遵循意向性分析原则;我们报告边际均值(MM),p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
我们招募了50名患者(OAB组n = 20,神经源性膀胱组n = 30);24名被分配到假刺激组,26名被分配到活性TTNS组。两组的基线特征相似。在研究结束时,假刺激组和活性组之间的PPBC没有显著差异:假刺激组患者中有13%(3/24)、活性TTNS组患者中有15%(4/26)有反应(p = 0.77),研究结束时PPBC评分的MM分别为3.3(95%置信区间[CI] 2.8 - 3.7)和2.9(95% CI 2.5 - 3.4)(p = 0.30)。同样,次要结局(24小时尿垫重量、排尿日记参数或特定疾病患者报告结局)也没有显著差异。在OAB和神经源性膀胱亚组中的结果相似。
TTNS似乎对治疗OAB患者或神经源性膀胱功能障碍患者的泌尿症状无效。