Agost-González Aida, Escobio-Prieto Isabel, Pareja-Leal Azahara M, Casuso-Holgado María Jesús, Blanco-Diaz María, Albornoz-Cabello Manuel
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Servicio Madrileño de Salud, D.A. Norte, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;9(7):879. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070879.
Percutaneous electrical stimulation and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (PTNS and TTNS) of the posterior tibial nerve are internationally recognized treatment methods that offer advantages in terms of treating patients with overactive bladder (OAB) who present with urinary incontinence (UI). This article aims to analyze the scientific evidence for the treatment of OAB with UI in adults using PTNS versus TTNS procedures in the posterior tibial nerve.
A systematic review was conducted, between February and May 2021 in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations.
The research identified 259 studies, 130 of which were selected and analyzed, with only 19 used according to the inclusion requirements established. The greatest effectiveness, in reducing UI and in other parameters of daily voiding and quality of life, was obtained by combining both techniques with other treatments, pharmacological treatments, or exercise.
TTNS has advantages over PTNS as it is more comfortable for the patient even though there is equality of both therapies in the outcome variables. More research studies are necessary in order to obtain clear scientific evidence.
胫后神经的经皮电刺激和经皮神经电刺激(PTNS和TTNS)是国际公认的治疗方法,在治疗伴有尿失禁(UI)的膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者方面具有优势。本文旨在分析使用胫后神经PTNS与TTNS程序治疗成人OAB伴UI的科学证据。
根据PRISMA建议,于2021年2月至5月在科学网和Scopus数据库中进行了系统评价。
该研究共识别出259项研究,其中130项被筛选并分析,只有19项符合既定的纳入要求。将这两种技术与其他治疗方法、药物治疗或运动相结合,在减少UI以及其他日常排尿参数和生活质量方面取得了最大效果。
TTNS比PTNS更具优势,因为尽管两种疗法在结果变量上相当,但TTNS让患者感觉更舒适。为了获得明确的科学证据,还需要更多的研究。