Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States of America.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Watershed & Ecosystem Characterization Division, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States of America.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136624. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136624. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus (DRP) losses from agricultural fields promote algae growth in water bodies, and may increase the risk of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs). Using existing data from the Lake Erie Basin, we applied multiple regression analysis to better understand the impacts of both site-specific conditions (e.g., soil types/properties) and management practices (e.g., Agricultural Conservation Practices [ACP]) on annual DRP losses in subsurface and surface runoff. Results showed that soil properties significantly impact DRP losses. Greater DRP losses were associated with increased soil pH and Soil Test Phosphorus (STP). By contrast, soil organic matter (SOM) was inversely correlated with DRP losses. Soil clay content was also inversely correlated with DRP subsurface losses, but had no impact on DRP surface losses. The ACPs evaluated had varied effectiveness on DRP loss reduction. Cropping systems involving soybean could reduce DRP subsurface losses, whereas winter cover crops could cause unintended DRP subsurface losses. Cropping systems involving soybean and cover crops, however, had no impact on DRP surface losses. In addition, no-till and conservation tillage also enhanced DRP losses compared to conventional tillage, particularly for soils with high SOM and/or high clay content. Precipitation amount and fertilizer application rate significantly increased DRP surface losses as expected. Fertilizer application rate, however, had no impact on DRP subsurface losses. The impact of precipitation amount on DRP subsurface losses depends on STP levels. Precipitation amount significantly increases DRP subsurface losses when STP is higher (>41 mg kg in this analysis). The optimal STP level for crop growth is 30 to 50 mg kg. Results from this study help us to better understand DRP losses and the effectiveness of ACPs for controlling them. We suggest taking soil surveys and soil tests into consideration when designing and/or implementing ACPs to manage DRP losses. Furthermore, the method we used for this study could be applied to other agricultural regions to investigate impacts of site-specific conditions and management practices on water quality.
农业领域的溶解态活性磷(DRP)流失会促进水体藻类生长,并可能增加有害藻华(HAB)的风险。本研究利用来自伊利湖流域的现有数据,应用多元回归分析更好地了解特定地点条件(如土壤类型/性质)和管理措施(如农业保护措施[ACP])对地下和地表径流水体中 DRP 年流失量的影响。结果表明,土壤性质对 DRP 流失有显著影响。土壤 pH 值和土壤测试磷(STP)增加与更大的 DRP 流失有关。相比之下,土壤有机质(SOM)与 DRP 流失呈负相关。土壤粘粒含量也与 DRP 地下流失呈负相关,但对 DRP 地表流失没有影响。评估的 ACP 对 DRP 流失减少的效果不同。涉及大豆的种植系统可以减少 DRP 地下流失,而冬季覆盖作物可能会导致意外的 DRP 地下流失。然而,涉及大豆和覆盖作物的种植系统对 DRP 地表流失没有影响。此外,与常规耕作相比,免耕和保护性耕作也会增加 DRP 流失,特别是对于 SOM 和/或粘粒含量较高的土壤。降水量和施肥率的增加与预期的一样,增加了 DRP 地表流失。然而,施肥率对 DRP 地下流失没有影响。降水量对 DRP 地下流失的影响取决于 STP 水平。当 STP 较高(本分析中>41mg/kg)时,降水量会显著增加 DRP 地下流失。作物生长的最佳 STP 水平为 30 至 50mg/kg。本研究结果有助于我们更好地了解 DRP 流失以及 ACP 对其控制的效果。我们建议在设计和/或实施 ACP 以管理 DRP 流失时,考虑土壤调查和土壤测试。此外,我们在本研究中使用的方法可以应用于其他农业地区,以调查特定地点条件和管理实践对水质的影响。