Liu W, Yuan Y, Koropeckyj-Cox L
USEPA Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Trans ASABE. 2021 Mar 1;64(2):675-689. doi: 10.13031/trans.14078.
Nutrient management, as described in NRCS Code 590, has been intensively investigated, with research largely focused on crop yields and water quality. Yet, due to complex processes and mechanisms in nutrient cycling (especially the nitrogen (N) cycle), there are many challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of nutrient management practices across site conditions. We therefore synthesized data from peer-reviewed publications on subsurface-drained agricultural fields in the Midwest U.S. with corn yield and drainage nitrate-N (NO3-N) export data published from 1980 to 2019. Through literature screening and data extraction from 43 publications, we obtained 577 site-years of data with detailed information on fertilization, corn yields, precipitation, drainage volume, and drainage NO3-N load/concentration or both. In addition, we estimated flow-weighted NO3-N concentrations ([NO3-N]) in drainage for those site-years where only load and volume were reported. Furthermore, we conducted a cost analysis using synthesized and surveyed corn yield data to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different nutrient management plans. Results from the synthesis showed that N fertilizer rate was strongly positively correlated with corn yields, NO3-N loads, and flow-weighted [NO3-N]. Reducing N fertilizer rates can effectively mitigate NO3-N losses from agricultural fields; however, our cost analysis showed negative economic returns for continuous corn production at lower N rates. In addition, organic fertilizers significantly boosted corn yields and NO3-N losses compared to inorganic fertilizers at comparable rates; however, accurate quantification of plant-available N in organic fertilizers is necessary to guide appropriate nutrient management plans because the nutrient content may be highly variable. In terms of fertilizer application methods, we did not find significant differences in NO3-N export in drainage discharge. Lastly, impact of fertilization timing on NO3-N export varied depending on other factors such as fertilizer rate, source, and weather. According to these results, we suggest that further efforts are still required to produce effective local nutrient management plans. Furthermore, government agencies such as USDA-NRCS need to work with other agencies such as USEPA to address the potential economic losses due to implementation of lower fertilizer rates for water quality improvement.
美国自然资源保护局(NRCS)规范590中所描述的养分管理已得到深入研究,研究主要集中在作物产量和水质方面。然而,由于养分循环过程和机制复杂(尤其是氮循环),在评估不同场地条件下养分管理措施的有效性时面临诸多挑战。因此,我们综合了美国中西部地下排水农田的同行评审出版物数据以及1980年至2019年公布的玉米产量和排水硝态氮(NO₃-N)出口数据。通过对43篇出版物进行文献筛选和数据提取,我们获得了577个站点年的数据,这些数据包含施肥、玉米产量、降水量、排水量以及排水NO₃-N负荷/浓度或两者的详细信息。此外,对于那些仅报告了负荷和水量的站点年,我们估算了排水中流量加权NO₃-N浓度([NO₃-N])。此外,我们利用综合和调查的玉米产量数据进行成本分析,以评估不同养分管理计划的成本效益。综合结果表明,氮肥施用量与玉米产量、NO₃-N负荷以及流量加权[NO₃-N]呈强正相关。降低氮肥施用量可以有效减少农田中NO₃-N的流失;然而,我们的成本分析表明,较低氮肥施用量下连续玉米生产的经济回报为负。此外,与同等用量的无机肥料相比,有机肥料显著提高了玉米产量和NO₃-N流失;然而,由于有机肥料中植物可利用氮的养分含量可能高度可变,因此需要准确量化有机肥料中的植物可利用氮,以指导适当的养分管理计划。在施肥方法方面,我们未发现排水排放中NO₃-N出口有显著差异。最后,施肥时间对NO₃-N出口的影响因肥料用量、来源和天气等其他因素而异。根据这些结果,我们建议仍需进一步努力制定有效的地方养分管理计划。此外,美国农业部自然资源保护局(USDA-NRCS)等政府机构需要与美国环境保护局(USEPA)等其他机构合作,以解决因降低肥料施用量以改善水质而可能造成的经济损失。