Suppr超能文献

肺动静脉畸形栓塞后再通:可解脱与推送式 coils 的随机对照试验。

Reperfusion of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Following Embolotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Detachable Versus Pushable Coils.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):904-909. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02422-8. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare 1 year post-embolization reperfusion rates in pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) treated with the 0.035″ Interlock™ Fibered IDC™ Occlusion System coils (IDC) (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) versus 0.035″ Nester coils (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, Indiana).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed randomizing individual PAVMs to treatment with IDC versus Nester coils at the largest hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia center in Canada. The primary outcome was CT evidence of reperfusion at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural complications, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume.

RESULTS

Our study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment and subsequent expiration of funding. A total of 46 PAVMs in 25 patients (64% female) were included in our study; 26 randomized to Nester coils and 20 randomized to IDC. One patient was lost to follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 421.2 ± 215.7 days, no significant difference in PAVM reperfusion was detected between Nester coils and IDC (0% vs. 5.6%, p > 0.05). No major periprocedural complications were noted in either group. Fluoroscopy time (Nester: 15.0 ± 11.8 min vs. IDC 16.0 ± 5.4 min, p > 0.05) and contrast volume (Nester: 80.3 ± 36.5 ml vs. IDC 87.3 ± 51.7 ml, p > 0.05) utilized did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was detected in PAVM reperfusion rates, periprocedural complication rates, contrast volume utilization or fluoroscopy time following embolization with IDC and Nester coils.

摘要

目的

比较 0.035 英寸 Interlock™ Fibered IDC™ 闭塞系统线圈(IDC)(波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)与 0.035 英寸 Nester 线圈(库克医疗公司,印第安纳州布鲁明顿)栓塞治疗肺动静脉畸形(PAVM)后 1 年的再灌注率。

材料与方法

在加拿大最大的遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症中心,进行了一项随机对照试验,将单个 PAVM 随机分配至 IDC 或 Nester 线圈治疗。主要结局为 1 年时 CT 证据显示再灌注。次要结局包括围手术期并发症、透视时间和对比剂用量。

结果

由于招募缓慢,随后资金耗尽,我们的研究提前终止。共有 25 名患者的 46 个 PAVM(64%为女性)纳入本研究;26 个随机分配至 Nester 线圈组,20 个随机分配至 IDC 组。1 例患者失访。在平均随访 421.2±215.7 天之后,Nester 线圈和 IDC 之间 PAVM 再灌注无显著差异(0% vs. 5.6%,p>0.05)。两组均无重大围手术期并发症。透视时间(Nester:15.0±11.8min vs. IDC:16.0±5.4min,p>0.05)和对比剂用量(Nester:80.3±36.5ml vs. IDC:87.3±51.7ml,p>0.05)无显著差异。

结论

IDC 和 Nester 线圈栓塞治疗后,PAVM 再灌注率、围手术期并发症发生率、对比剂用量或透视时间无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验