Pearse Bronwyn L, Keogh Samantha, Rickard Claire M, Faulke Daniel J, Smith Ian, Wall Douglas, McDonald Charles, Fung Yoke L
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Department of Anaesthesia and Perfusion, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Jan 15;13:27-41. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S232888. eCollection 2020.
Excessive bleeding is an acknowledged consequence of cardiac surgery, occurring in up to 10% of adult patients. This clinically important complication leads to poorer patient outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines are available to support best practice however variability in bleeding management practice and related adverse outcomes still exist. This study had two objectives: 1) to gain insight into current bleeding management practice for adult cardiac surgery in Australia and how that compared to guidelines and literature; and 2) to understand perceived difficulties clinicians face implementing improvements in bleeding management.
A national cross-sectional questionnaire survey was utilized. Perspectives were sought from cardiac surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists and perfusionists. Thirty-nine closed-ended questions focused on routine bleeding management practices to address pre and intra-operative care. One open-ended question was asked; "What would assist you to improve bleeding management with cardiac surgery patients?" Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS. Qualitative data were categorized into the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework; the domains were then mapped to the COM-B model.
Survey responses from 159 Anesthesiologists, 39 cardiac surgeons and 86 perfusionists were included (response rate 37%). Four of the recommendations queried in this survey were reported as routinely adhered to < 50% of the time, 9 queried recommendations were adhered to 51-75% of the time and 4 recommendations were routinely followed >76% of the time.
There is a wide variation in peri-operative bleeding management practice among cardiac anaesthesiologists, surgeons and perfusionists in Australian cardiac surgery units. Conceptualizing factors believed necessary to improve practice with the TDF and COM-B model found that bleeding management could be improved with a standardized approach including; point of care diagnostic assays, a bleeding management algorithm, access to concentrated coagulation factors, cardiac surgery specific bleeding management education, multidisciplinary team agreement and support, and an overarching national approach.
出血过多是心脏手术公认的后果,在多达10%的成年患者中出现。这种具有临床重要性的并发症会导致患者预后更差。虽然有临床实践指南来支持最佳实践,但出血管理实践及相关不良后果仍存在差异。本研究有两个目标:1)深入了解澳大利亚成人心脏手术当前的出血管理实践及其与指南和文献的比较;2)了解临床医生在实施出血管理改进措施时所面临的困难。
采用全国性横断面问卷调查。收集心脏外科医生、心脏麻醉医生和灌注师的观点。39个封闭式问题聚焦于常规出血管理实践,以涵盖术前和术中护理。还提出了一个开放式问题:“什么能帮助您改善心脏手术患者的出血管理?”使用SPSS分析定量数据。定性数据被归类到理论领域框架的各个领域;然后将这些领域映射到COM - B模型。
纳入了159名麻醉医生、39名心脏外科医生和86名灌注师的调查回复(回复率37%)。本调查中询问的建议里,有4条报告显示常规遵循率低于50%,9条询问的建议遵循率为51 - 75%,4条建议的常规遵循率高于76%。
澳大利亚心脏手术科室的心脏麻醉医生、外科医生和灌注师在围手术期出血管理实践方面存在很大差异。通过理论领域框架(TDF)和COM - B模型将认为对改善实践必要的因素概念化后发现,采用标准化方法可改善出血管理,包括:即时检验诊断分析、出血管理算法、浓缩凝血因子的获取、心脏手术特定的出血管理教育、多学科团队的共识与支持以及全面的国家方法。