Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中多病共存患者的生活质量具体测量方法:关于患者报告结局测量指标测量充分性的系统评价

Specific Measures of Quality of Life in Patients with Multimorbidity in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures' Adequacy of Measurement.

作者信息

Møller Anne, Bissenbakker Kristine Henderson, Arreskov Anne Beiter, Brodersen John

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2020 Jan 8;11:1-10. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S226576. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to search systematically for Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used among patients with multimorbidity. Furthermore, the aim is to evaluate the adequacy and validity of the PROMs identified.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This systematic review follows the PRISMA guidelines. To assess the adequacy and validity of the identified PROMs the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist is used, more specifically a validation of the development, content validity, structural validity, and internal consistency of the PROMs.

RESULTS

Four PROMs were identified in the primary search, and one was found from references. The sixth PROM was published after the primary search. None of the identified PROMs were aimed specifically at measuring the quality of life in patients with multimorbidity. According to the checklist, the development process and content validity were rated "adequate" in only one measure and "invalid"/"doubtful"/"inadequate" in the rest of the measures. The structural validity of the measures was rated "adequate" in four measures and "very good" in one. Regarding the internal consistency, two measures were rated doubtful and three "very good". None of the six PROMs reported analyses about invariant measurement. The COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist proved easy to use; however, there are some concerns in the rating of bias, that are discussed further.

CONCLUSION

All six PROMs developed for patients with multimorbidity identified possessed inadequacy in their measurement properties. Therefore, the aim for the future is to develop a valid and adequate measure of the quality of life among patients with multimorbidity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统检索合并症患者使用的患者报告结局量表(PROMs)。此外,目的是评估所识别的PROMs的充分性和有效性。

设计与背景

本系统评价遵循PRISMA指南。为评估所识别的PROMs的充分性和有效性,使用了COSMIN偏倚风险检查表,更具体地说是对PROMs的开发、内容效度、结构效度和内部一致性进行验证。

结果

在初步检索中识别出4个PROMs,从参考文献中找到1个。第六个PROM在初步检索后发表。所识别的PROMs均未专门针对测量合并症患者的生活质量。根据检查表,仅一项测量的开发过程和内容效度被评为“充分”,其余测量被评为“无效”/“可疑”/“不充分”。四项测量的结构效度被评为“充分”,一项被评为“非常好”。关于内部一致性,两项测量被评为可疑,三项被评为“非常好”。六个PROMs均未报告关于测量不变性的分析。COSMIN偏倚风险检查表证明易于使用;然而,在偏倚评级方面存在一些问题,将进一步讨论。

结论

为合并症患者开发的所有六个PROMs在所测量的属性方面都存在不足。因此,未来的目标是开发一种有效且充分的合并症患者生活质量测量方法。

相似文献

2
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600.
3
Four of five frequently used orthopedic PROMs possess inadequate content validity: a COSMIN evaluation of the mHHS, HAGOS, IKDC-SKF, KOOS and KNEES-ACL.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3602-3615. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06761-y. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
6
Validity of Current Assessment Tools Aiming to Measure the Affective Component of Pain: A Systematic Review.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2021 Jul 6;12:213-226. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S304950. eCollection 2021.
7
Development, women-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A systematic review.
Women Birth. 2023 Nov;36(6):e563-e573. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
10
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2929-2939. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03761-6. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
4
Untangling the complex relationship between bipolar disorder and anxiety: a comprehensive review of prevalence, prognosis, and therapy.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Apr;132(4):567-578. doi: 10.1007/s00702-024-02876-x. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
5
Oxford Shoulder Instability Score: cross-cultural adaptation into Spanish and analysis of its methodological quality.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 23;25(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08075-9.
6
Performance management of generalist care for hospitalised multimorbid patients-a scoping review for value-based care.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Feb 26;3:1147565. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1147565. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Fitting item response unfolding models to Likert-scale data using mirt in R.
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196292. eCollection 2018.
2
Development and validation of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ).
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e019413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019413.
3
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Multi-morbidity: A patient perspective on navigating the health care system and everyday life.
Chronic Illn. 2018 Dec;14(4):271-282. doi: 10.1177/1742395317731607. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.
10
Problems and challenges in relation to the treatment of patients with multimorbidity: General practitioners' views and attitudes.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015 Jun;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1041828. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验