• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用患者报告结局测量评估门诊产后康复:系统评价。

Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600
PMID:34042993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8160591/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Outpatient postpartum recovery is an underexplored area of obstetrics. There is currently no consensus regarding which patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) clinicians and researchers should use to evaluate postpartum recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate PROMs of outpatient postpartum recovery using Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

An initial literature search performed in July 2019 identified postpartum recovery PROMs and validation studies. A secondary search in July 2020 identified additional validation studies. Both searches were performed using 4 databases (Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL), with no date limiters. Studies with PROMs evaluating more than 3 proposed outpatient postpartum recovery domains were considered. Studies were included if they assessed any psychometric measurement property of the included PROMs in the outpatient postpartum setting. The PROMs were assessed for the following 8 psychometric measurement properties, as defined by COSMIN: content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness. Psychometric measurement properties were evaluated in each included study using the COSMIN criteria by assessing (1) the quality of the methods (very good, adequate, doubtful, inadequate, or not assessed); (2) overall rating of results (sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate); (3) level of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessment tool; and (4) level of recommendation, which included class A (recommended for use; showed adequate content validity with at least low-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency), class B (not class A or class C), or class C (not recommended).

FINDINGS

In total, 15 PROMs (7 obstetric specific and 8 non-obstetric specific) were identified, evaluating outpatient postpartum recovery in 46 studies involving 19 165 women. The majority of psychometric measurement properties of the included PROMs were graded as having very-low-level or low-level evidence. The best-performing PROMs that received class A recommendations were the Maternal Concerns Questionnaire, the Postpartum Quality of Life tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF. The remainder of the evaluated PROMs had insufficient evidence to make recommendations regarding their use (and received class B recommendations).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review found that the best-performing PROMs currently available to evaluate outpatient postpartum recovery were the Maternal Concerns Questionnaire, the Postpartum Quality of Life tool, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF; however, these tools all had significant limitations. This study highlights the need to focus future efforts on robustly developing and validating a new PROM that may comprehensively evaluate outpatient postpartum recovery.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cd/8160591/8f4f2bbd1ce0/jamanetwopen-e2111600-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cd/8160591/8f4f2bbd1ce0/jamanetwopen-e2111600-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74cd/8160591/8f4f2bbd1ce0/jamanetwopen-e2111600-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

产后门诊康复是产科领域中一个尚未得到充分探索的领域。目前,对于评估产后康复,临床医生和研究人员应该使用哪种患者报告结局测量(PROM)工具,尚无共识。

目的

使用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南评估门诊产后康复的 PROM。

证据综述

2019 年 7 月进行的初步文献检索确定了产后康复 PROM 和验证研究。2020 年 7 月的二次检索确定了其他验证研究。这两次搜索均使用了 4 个数据库(Web of Science、Embase、PubMed 和 CINAHL),没有日期限制。考虑了评估超过 3 个门诊产后康复领域的 PROM。如果研究评估了门诊产后环境中包含的 PROM 的任何心理测量特性,则将其纳入研究。使用 COSMIN 标准评估了 PROM 的以下 8 个心理测量特性:内容有效性、结构有效性、内部一致性、跨文化有效性和测量不变性、可靠性、测量误差、假设检验和反应性。在每个纳入的研究中,通过评估(1)方法的质量(非常好、足够、可疑、不足或未评估);(2)结果的总体评估(充分、不充分、不一致或不确定);(3)使用推荐、评估、发展和评估评估工具评估的证据水平;(4)推荐级别,包括 A 级(推荐使用;显示出足够的内容有效性,至少有低质量的证据表明足够的内部一致性)、B 级(非 A 级或 C 级)或 C 级(不推荐),来评估心理测量特性。

发现

总共确定了 15 种 PROM(7 种产科专用和 8 种非产科专用),在涉及 19165 名女性的 46 项研究中评估了门诊产后康复。纳入的 PROM 的大多数心理测量特性的评估结果均为极低或低水平的证据。表现最好的获得 A 级推荐的 PROM 是产妇关注点问卷、产后生活质量工具和世界卫生组织生活质量简表。其余经过评估的 PROM 获得了 B 级推荐,其证据不足以推荐使用。

结论和相关性

本综述发现,目前可用于评估门诊产后康复的表现最佳的 PROM 是产妇关注点问卷、产后生活质量工具和世界卫生组织生活质量简表;然而,这些工具都存在显著的局限性。本研究强调需要集中精力未来的研究工作应致力于开发和验证一种新的 PROM,该 PROM可能全面评估门诊产后康复。

相似文献

1
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.使用患者报告结局测量评估门诊产后康复:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600.
2
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline: A Systematic Review.采用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估产妇产后抑郁症患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14885.
3
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures to assess postpartum pain using Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.采用共识导向的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南对评估产后疼痛的患者报告结局测量进行系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;127(2):264-274. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.03.035. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess sleep in postpartum women using Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.采用共识导向的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南对用于评估产后女性睡眠的患者报告结局测量进行系统评价。
Sleep. 2021 Oct 11;44(10). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab128.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures evaluating postpartum maternal health and well-being: a systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties.评估产后母亲健康与福祉的患者报告结局指标:测量属性的系统评价与评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100743. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100743. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review of Measure Development and Measurement Properties.患者报告的痤疮患者健康相关生活质量结局测量指标:测量开发和测量特性的系统评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):900-911. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2260.
7
The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods.用于评估低血糖对糖尿病患者生活质量影响的患者报告结局测量工具的适用性:使用 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1213-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05382-x. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Psoriasis: A Systematic Review.患者报告的银屑病患者健康相关生活质量结局测量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 May 1;160(5):550-563. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.5439.
9
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in maternal postpartum anxiety.系统评价用于产妇产后焦虑的患者报告结局测量指标。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Sep;5(9):101076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101076. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
10
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.评价成人脊柱侧弯生活质量的评估方法:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00498-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy variables that impact postpartum quality of life: a multicenter prospective study.影响产后生活质量的妊娠相关因素:一项多中心前瞻性研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10699-3.
2
Development and Validation of the Stanford Obstetric Recovery Checklist (STORK): A Delphi Consensus and Multicenter Clinical Validation Study.斯坦福产科恢复检查表(STORK)的开发与验证:一项德尔菲共识及多中心临床验证研究
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255713. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5713.
3
Profiling Postpartum Recovery After Scheduled Cesarean Delivery With Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Postpartum recovery: what does it take to get back to a baseline?产后恢复:需要什么才能恢复到基线?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):86-93. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000684.
2
Evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 patient-reported outcome measure: a single-center observational study.采用产科康复质量-10 患者报告结局测量评估住院产后恢复:一项单中心观察性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100202. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Evaluation of Domains of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Recovery After Childbirth: A Scoping and Systematic Review.
硬膜外麻醉下行择期剖宫产术后的产后恢复情况剖析:一项纵向队列研究
Anesth Analg. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007476.
4
Critical signs and symptoms for self-assessment in the immediate postnatal period: an international Systematic Scoping Review and Delphi consensus study.产后即刻自我评估的关键体征和症状:一项国际系统综述和德尔菲共识研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07472-9.
5
Do We Have the Evidence to Produce Tools to Enable the Identification and Personalization of Management of Women's Pelvic Floor Health Disorders Through the Perinatal and Perimenopausal Periods? ICI-RS 2024.我们是否有证据来开发工具,以实现对围产期和围绝经期女性盆底健康障碍的识别和个性化管理?ICI-RS 2024。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Mar;44(3):651-660. doi: 10.1002/nau.70019. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
6
Association of inpatient postpartum recovery with patient-reported outcome measures following hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study.产后住院康复与出院后患者报告结局指标的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06805-4.
7
Development and validation of the physical exercise program "Active Mums" for postpartum recovery: application of the CReDECI-2 guidelines.“Active Mums”产后恢复运动方案的制定和验证:CReDECI-2 指南的应用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 20;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06387-1.
8
Understanding Symptom Self-Monitoring Needs Among Postpartum Black Patients: Qualitative Interview Study.理解产后黑人患者的症状自我监测需求:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 26;26:e47484. doi: 10.2196/47484.
9
Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish).西班牙语版产科恢复质量10项评分(ObsQoR-10-西班牙语版)的开发与验证。
BJA Open. 2024 Mar 21;10:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a digital questionnaire for the self-management of health and well-being in the postpartum period.开发和评估用于产后自我管理健康和幸福感的数字问卷的心理测量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05899-6.
分娩后恢复患者报告结局测量的评估:范围和系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205540. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5540.
4
Comparison of Maternal Functioning between Iranian Mothers with and without Depressive Symptoms: A Case-Control Study.伊朗有抑郁症状和无抑郁症状母亲的母体功能比较:病例对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3350. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103350.
5
Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery versus standard care studies: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes.剖宫产术后加速康复与标准护理比较的研究:干预措施和结局的系统评价。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Aug;43:72-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
6
Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study.使用产后恢复质量-10量表(ObsQoR-10)对自然阴道分娩与手术阴道分娩的比较:一项观察性队列研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109781. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
The Relationship between Maternal Functioning and Mental Health after Childbirth in Iranian Women.伊朗女性产后的母婴功能与心理健康之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 28;17(5):1558. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051558.
8
More than just morbidity and mortality - quality of recovery and long-term functional recovery after surgery.不仅仅是发病率和死亡率——手术后的恢复质量和长期功能恢复。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e143-e150. doi: 10.1111/anae.14786.
9
Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures of functional recovery following caesarean section: a systematic review using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist.剖宫产术后功能恢复的患者报告结局测量评估:使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单的系统评价。
Anaesthesia. 2019 Nov;74(11):1439-1455. doi: 10.1111/anae.14807. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
10
Vital Signs: Pregnancy-Related Deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and Strategies for Prevention, 13 States, 2013-2017.生命体征:2011-2015 年美国与妊娠相关的死亡情况,以及 2013-2017 年 13 个州的预防策略。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 May 10;68(18):423-429. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6818e1.