• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面临离开医学院风险的教师特征:基于StandPoint™教师敬业度调查的分析

Characteristics of Faculty at Risk of Leaving Their Medical Schools: An Analysis of the StandPoint™ Faculty Engagement Survey.

作者信息

Zimmermann Ellen M, Mramba Lazarus K, Gregoire Hamleen, Dandar Valerie, Limacher Marian C, Good Michael L

机构信息

Faculty Development, College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Leadersh. 2020 Jan 8;12:1-10. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S225291. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/JHL.S225291
PMID:32021533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6955602/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study seeks to identify the characteristics and attitudes of faculty in US medical colleges who are at risk of leaving their institution.

METHODS

This research leverages data from the AAMC StandPoint Faculty Engagement Survey administered to 37,779 faculty representing 36 institutions participating during 2013-2016. Univariate and multivariable robust logistic regression models were used to assess predictors of the intent to leave based on the question: "Do you plan to leave this medical school in the next 1-2 years?".

RESULTS

Thirty percent (n=5559/18,475) of faculty responded that they were considering leaving their institution. Thirty-one percent of female faculty vs 29% of male faculty expressed an intent to leave. At-risk faculty were likely to be at junior faculty rank and at their institutions for 6-15 years vs other time periods (OR=1.16; p≤0.001). Having an administrative title (OR=0.72; p≤0.001) and receiving formal mentorship (OR=0.65; p≤0.001) were protective. Finally, faculty answering "disagree" or "strongly disagree" to any one of these StandPoint Survey questions were at > 6 fold risk of expressing an intent to leave: 1) I am satisfied with my opportunities for professional development, 2) I feel appreciated by my supervisor, 3) My day-to-day activities give me a sense of accomplishment.

CONCLUSION

Faculty expressing an intent to leave their institution have an identifiable profile. Top concerns of at-risk faculty relate to supervisory relationships and growth opportunities rather than compensation or governance. Institutional leaders should consider these factors in the development of a proactive strategy to retain talented faculty.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定美国医学院校中存在离职风险的教职员工的特征和态度。

方法

本研究利用了美国医学协会(AAMC)立场教职员工参与度调查的数据,该调查针对2013 - 2016年期间参与的36所机构的37779名教职员工进行。使用单变量和多变量稳健逻辑回归模型,根据“你是否计划在未来1 - 2年内离开这所医学院?”这一问题来评估离职意愿的预测因素。

结果

30%(n = 5559 / 18475)的教职员工表示他们正在考虑离开所在机构。31%的女性教职员工与29%的男性教职员工表达了离职意愿。与其他时间段相比,有离职风险的教职员工可能处于初级教职级别且在所在机构工作6 - 15年(OR = 1.16;p≤0.001)。拥有行政头衔(OR = 0.72;p≤0.001)和接受正式指导(OR = 0.65;p≤0.001)具有保护作用。最后,对立场调查中的任何一个问题回答“不同意”或“强烈不同意”的教职员工表达离职意愿的风险增加超过6倍,这些问题包括:1)我对自己的职业发展机会感到满意,2)我感到受到上级的赏识,3)我的日常活动给我一种成就感。

结论

表达离职意愿的教职员工具有可识别的特征。有离职风险的教职员工最关心的是监督关系和成长机会,而非薪酬或管理。机构领导者在制定积极主动留住优秀教职员工的策略时应考虑这些因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/d9857ddd09d6/JHL-12-1-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/a8ed3a151381/JHL-12-1-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/72c196454184/JHL-12-1-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/b0f7998be3ec/JHL-12-1-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/d9857ddd09d6/JHL-12-1-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/a8ed3a151381/JHL-12-1-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/72c196454184/JHL-12-1-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/b0f7998be3ec/JHL-12-1-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023a/6955602/d9857ddd09d6/JHL-12-1-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Faculty at Risk of Leaving Their Medical Schools: An Analysis of the StandPoint™ Faculty Engagement Survey.面临离开医学院风险的教师特征:基于StandPoint™教师敬业度调查的分析
J Healthc Leadersh. 2020 Jan 8;12:1-10. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S225291. eCollection 2020.
2
Engagement, workplace satisfaction, and retention of surgical specialists in academic medicine in the United States.美国学术医学中外科专家的参与度、工作满意度和保留率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jul;219(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
3
Sex Differences in Workplace Satisfaction and Engagement of Academic Pathologists: Opportunities to Enhance Faculty Diversity.学术病理学家工作场所满意度和敬业度的性别差异:增加教职员工多样性的机会。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Jul;139(7):936-42. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0312-EP. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
4
Time well spent: the association between time and effort allocation and intent to leave among clinical faculty.时间花得其所:临床教员的时间与精力分配和离职意愿之间的关联
Acad Med. 2015 Mar;90(3):365-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000458.
5
Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools.为什么有四分之一的教职员工考虑离开学术医学领域?对美国 26 所代表性医学院校的机构文化认知和离职意向的研究。
Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):859-69. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182582b18.
6
Academic Medicine Faculty Perceptions of Work-Life Balance Before and Since the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后,医学学术领域对工作与生活平衡的看法
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113539. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13539.
7
Engagement and Workplace Satisfaction of Emergency Medicine Faculty in the United States.美国急诊医学教员的敬业度与工作满意度
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Jun 2;5(2):e10474. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10474. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Women and the Decision to Leave, Linger, or Lean In: Predictors of Intent to Leave and Aspirations to Leadership and Advancement in Academic Medicine.女性离职、留守还是进取:学术医学中离职意愿及领导和晋升愿望的预测因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):324-332. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6457. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
9
Predictors of Physician Assistant Faculty Intent to Leave Academia: A Rasch Regression Analysis.医师助理教员离职学术界意向的预测因素:一项拉施回归分析
J Physician Assist Educ. 2017 Mar;28(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000103.
10
The impact of burnout on doctorate nursing faculty's intent to leave their academic position: A descriptive survey research design. burnout 对博士护理教师离职意向的影响:描述性调查研究设计。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Sense of Belonging and Intent to Leave Among Medical School Faculty.医学院教员的归属感与离职意向
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e257728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7728.
2
Physician turnover rates and job stability in interventional spine and pain practices: Results of an IPSIS survey study.介入脊柱与疼痛治疗领域的医生离职率及工作稳定性:一项IPSIS调查研究的结果
Interv Pain Med. 2024 Mar 2;3(1):100392. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100392. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Pediatric Faculty Engagement and Associated Areas of Worklife After a COVID19 Surge.

本文引用的文献

1
Independent investigator incubator (I): a comprehensive mentorship program to jumpstart productive research careers for junior faculty.独立研究员孵化器(I):一个全面的指导计划,旨在为初级教员启动多产的研究事业。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1290-3.
2
The impact of active mentorship: results from a survey of faculty in the Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital.积极指导的影响:来自马萨诸塞州综合医院医学系教师调查的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 11;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1191-5.
3
Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions.
新冠疫情高峰后儿科教职人员的参与度及相关工作生活领域
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Nov 28;15:375-383. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S410797. eCollection 2023.
4
Workplace Belonging of Women Healthcare Professionals Relates to Likelihood of Leaving.女性医疗保健专业人员在工作场所的归属感与离职可能性相关。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Oct 26;15:273-284. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S431157. eCollection 2023.
5
Value, Support, and Advancement: An Organization's Role in Faculty Career Intentions in Academic Medicine.价值、支持与进步:组织在学术医学领域教师职业意向中的作用
J Healthc Leadersh. 2021 Nov 19;13:267-277. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S334838. eCollection 2021.
医生职业倦怠:成因、后果及应对策略。
J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529. doi: 10.1111/joim.12752. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
Identifying diverse life transition patterns from adolescence to young adulthood: The influence of early socioeconomic context.识别从青春期到青年期的多种生活转变模式:早期社会经济环境的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2018 Feb;70:212-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
A Review of Mentoring in Academic Medicine.学术医学中的指导综述
Am J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;353(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Self-care as a professional imperative: physician burnout, depression, and suicide.自我关怀作为一项职业要务:医生职业倦怠、抑郁与自杀。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;64(2):158-168. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0781-0. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout.行政领导与医生福祉:促进参与度和减少职业倦怠的九种组织策略。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):129-146. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Does formal mentoring for faculty members matter? A survey of clinical faculty members.对教员进行正式指导重要吗?一项针对临床教员的调查。
Med Educ. 2016 Jun;50(6):670-81. doi: 10.1111/medu.12972.
9
A Matrix Mentoring Model That Effectively Supports Clinical and Translational Scientists and Increases Inclusion in Biomedical Research: Lessons From the University of Utah.一种有效支持临床和转化科学家并增加生物医学研究包容性的矩阵指导模式:来自犹他大学的经验教训。
Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):497-502. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001021.
10
Time well spent: the association between time and effort allocation and intent to leave among clinical faculty.时间花得其所:临床教员的时间与精力分配和离职意愿之间的关联
Acad Med. 2015 Mar;90(3):365-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000458.