Farag Alexander, Rosen Marc R, Ziegler Natalie, Rimmer Ryan A, Evans James J, Farrell Christopher J, Nyquist Gurston G
Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Department of Otolaryngology and Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Feb;81(1):1-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676826. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
In the setting of craniotomy, complications after traversing the frontal sinus can lead to mucocele formation and frontal sinusitis. We review the etiology of frontal sinus violation, timeline to mucocele development, intraoperative management of the violated sinus, and treatment of frontal mucoceles. Case series in conjunction with a literature review. A total of 35 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Nine of these patients were treated at a tertiary academic medical center between 2005 and 2014. The remaining patients were identified through a literature review for which 2,763 articles were identified, of which 4 articles met inclusion criteria. Etiology of frontal violation, timeline to mucocele development, and method of management. The overall interval from initial frontal sinus violation until mucocele identification was 14.5 years, with a range of 3 months to 36 years. The most common cause of mucocele formation was obstruction of the frontal recess with incomplete removal of the frontal sinus mucosa. The majority of patients were successfully managed with an endoscopic endonasal approach. Violation of the frontal sinus during craniotomy can result in mucocele formation as an early or late sequela. Image guidance may help avoid unnecessary frontal sinus violation. Mucoceles may develop decades after the initial frontal sinus violation, and long-term follow-up with imaging is recommended. While the endoscopic endonasal approach is usually the preferred method to treat these lesions, it may be necessary to perform obliteration or cranialization in unique situations.
在开颅手术过程中,穿过额窦后的并发症可导致黏液囊肿形成和额窦炎。我们回顾了额窦侵犯的病因、黏液囊肿形成的时间线、受侵犯鼻窦的术中处理以及额窦黏液囊肿的治疗。 病例系列结合文献综述。 本荟萃分析共纳入35例患者。其中9例患者于2005年至2014年在一家三级学术医疗中心接受治疗。其余患者通过文献综述确定,共检索到2763篇文章,其中4篇符合纳入标准。 额窦侵犯的病因、黏液囊肿形成的时间线及处理方法。 从最初额窦侵犯到发现黏液囊肿的总间隔时间为14.5年,范围为3个月至36年。黏液囊肿形成的最常见原因是额隐窝阻塞且额窦黏膜未完全清除。大多数患者通过鼻内镜鼻内入路成功治疗。 开颅手术中额窦侵犯可导致黏液囊肿形成,作为早期或晚期后遗症。影像引导可能有助于避免不必要的额窦侵犯。黏液囊肿可能在最初额窦侵犯数十年后出现,建议进行长期影像学随访。虽然鼻内镜鼻内入路通常是治疗这些病变的首选方法,但在特殊情况下可能需要进行填塞或额窦颅骨化手术。