Peters David R, Payne Caitlin, Wait Scott D
Department of Neurosurgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jul;82(Suppl 3):e190-e195. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402025. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
The eyebrow orbitozygomatic craniotomy is a minimally invasive approach that can access a wide variety of lesions. Unintentional breach of the frontal sinus frequently occurs and has been cited as a reason to avoid this approach. Lack of access to a large pericranial graft and the inability to completely cranialize the sinus requires alternate techniques of sinus repair. We describe a technique for repairing an opened frontal sinus and retrospectively reviewed complications related to this approach. All patients, who underwent an orbitozygomatic craniotomy via an eyebrow incision by a single surgeon from August 1, 2012 to August 31, 2018, were included in this retrospective analysis. Data were collected on patient demographics, pathology treated, operative details, and perioperative morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 6 years. Total 50 patients with a wide variety of pathologies underwent analysis. Frontal sinus breach occurred in 21 patients. All were repaired by the described technique. One patient (ruptured aneurysm) had a suspected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak postoperatively that resolved without any additional intervention. One patient developed a pneumomeningocele 4 years postoperatively that required reoperation. No patient suffered any infection or delayed CSF leak. Breach of the frontal sinus is common during eyebrow craniotomies. Despite reduced options for local repair, these patients have experienced no CSF leaks requiring intervention and no infections in our series. Long-term mucocele risk is not reliably determined with our length of follow-up. Breach of the frontal sinus is not a contraindication to the eyebrow approach.
眉弓眶颧开颅术是一种微创入路,可用于处理多种病变。额窦意外破裂经常发生,这被认为是避免采用这种入路的一个原因。由于无法获取大片颅骨膜瓣以及不能完全封闭额窦,需要采用其他的额窦修复技术。我们描述了一种修复开放额窦的技术,并对与该入路相关的并发症进行了回顾性分析。
所有在2012年8月1日至2018年8月31日期间由同一位外科医生经眉弓切口行眶颧开颅术的患者均纳入本回顾性分析。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、所治疗的病理情况、手术细节以及围手术期发病率。随访时间为6周至6年。
共有50例患有各种病变的患者接受了分析。21例患者发生了额窦破裂。所有患者均采用所述技术进行了修复。1例患者(破裂动脉瘤)术后怀疑有脑脊液漏,未经任何额外干预自行缓解。1例患者术后4年发生了气脑膨出,需要再次手术。没有患者发生感染或延迟性脑脊液漏。
在眉弓开颅术中,额窦破裂很常见。尽管局部修复的选择有限,但在我们的系列研究中,这些患者没有出现需要干预的脑脊液漏,也没有发生感染。根据我们的随访时间,无法可靠地确定长期发生黏液囊肿的风险。额窦破裂并非眉弓入路的禁忌证。