Murphy Patricia, Kumar Dinesh, Zammit Gary, Rosenberg Russell, Moline Margaret
Formerly of Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey.
Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 May 15;16(5):765-773. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8294. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Our aim was to evaluate the effect of lemborexant versus zolpidem tartrate extended release 6.25 mg (ZOL) or placebo (PBO) on postural stability, auditory awakening threshold (AAT), and cognitive performance (cognitive performance assessment battery [CPAB]).
Healthy women (≥ 55 years) and men (≥ 65 years) were randomized, double-blind, to 1 of 4-period, single-dose crossover sequences, starting with lemborexant 5 mg (LEM5), 10 mg (LEM10), ZOL, or PBO. A ≥ 14-day washout followed all 4 treatments. Assessments were middle-of-the-night (MOTN) change from baseline in postural stability (primary prespecified comparison: LEM vs ZOL), AAT, absolute AAT, and CPAB for LEM5 and LEM10 versus ZOL and PBO; and morning change from baseline in postural stability and CPAB for LEM5 and LEM10 versus ZOL and PBO. Change from baseline measures were time-matched to a baseline night/morning when no study drug was administered.
MOTN: Mean MOTN change from baseline in body sway was significantly higher for ZOL versus both lemborexant doses. There were no differences among the treatments regarding decibels required to awaken a participant. LEM5 was not statistically different from PBO on any CPAB domain; LEM10 and ZOL showed poorer performance on some tests of attention and/or memory. Morning: Body sway and cognitive performance following LEM5 or LEM10 did not differ from PBO; body sway was significantly higher for ZOL than PBO. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were low; there were no serious adverse events.
Lemborexant causes less postural instability than a commonly used sedative-hypnotic and does not impair the ability to awaken to auditory signals.
Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Lemborexant Versus Placebo and Zolpidem on Postural Stability, Auditory Awakening Threshold, and Cognitive Performance in Healthy Subjects 55 Years and Older; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03008447; Identifier: NCT03008447.
我们的目的是评估lemborexant与6.25毫克缓释酒石酸唑吡坦(ZOL)或安慰剂(PBO)对姿势稳定性、听觉觉醒阈值(AAT)和认知表现(认知表现评估量表[CPAB])的影响。
健康女性(≥55岁)和男性(≥65岁)被随机、双盲分配至4期单剂量交叉序列中的一种,起始用药为5毫克lemborexant(LEM5)、10毫克lemborexant(LEM10)、ZOL或PBO。所有4种治疗后均有≥14天的洗脱期。评估指标为姿势稳定性从基线至午夜(MOTN)的变化(主要预先指定的比较:LEM与ZOL)、AAT、绝对AAT,以及LEM5和LEM10与ZOL和PBO相比的CPAB;还有LEM5和LEM10与ZOL和PBO相比,姿势稳定性和CPAB从基线至早晨的变化。从基线测量的变化与未服用研究药物的基线夜晚/早晨进行时间匹配。
午夜:ZOL组身体摆动从基线至MOTN的平均变化显著高于两种lemborexant剂量组。在唤醒参与者所需的分贝数方面,各治疗组之间没有差异。在任何CPAB领域,LEM5与PBO没有统计学差异;LEM10和ZOL在一些注意力和/或记忆力测试中表现较差。早晨:LEM5或LEM10后的身体摆动和认知表现与PBO没有差异;ZOL的身体摆动显著高于PBO。治疗中出现不良事件的发生率较低;没有严重不良事件。
与常用的镇静催眠药相比,lemborexant引起的姿势不稳定较少,并且不损害对听觉信号的觉醒能力。
注册机构:ClinicalTrials.gov;名称:评估lemborexant与安慰剂和唑吡坦对55岁及以上健康受试者姿势稳定性、听觉觉醒阈值和认知表现影响的交叉研究;网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03008447;标识符:NCT03008447。