Suppr超能文献

采用实用内侧支阻滞模式选择患者的慢性小关节综合征行颈椎内侧支射频消融术的疗效

The Effectiveness of Cervical Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by a Practical Medial Branch Block Paradigm.

作者信息

Burnham Taylor, Conger Aaron, Salazar Fabio, Petersen Russell, Kendall Richard, Cunningham Shellie, Teramoto Masaru, McCormick Zachary L

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2071-2076. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz358.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation (CMBRFA) is an effective treatment for facetogenic pain in patients selected by Spine Intervention Society (SIS) guidelines of 100% symptom improvement with dual medial branch blocks (MBBs) ± placebo block. Patient selection for CMBRFA using ≥80% symptom improvement after dual concordant MBBs is common; however, this has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of CMBRFA and compare outcomes in individuals selected by 80-99% vs 100% symptom improvement with dual concordant MBBs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional cohort study.

METHODS

Medical records of 87 consecutive patients were reviewed; 50 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was performed at six or more months post-CMBRFA to query numerical rating scale (NRS) pain and patient global impression of change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients reporting ≥50% reduction of index pain.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up time of 16.9 ± 12.7 months, 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 35-73%) and 54% (95% CI = 32-74%) of the 80-99% and 100% MBBs groups, respectively, reported ≥50% pain reduction. Between-group comparison showed a relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.59-1.66) for meeting the primary outcome. Seventy percent (95% CI = 56-81%) of patients reported a PGIC score consistent with "improved or very much improved" at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

CMBRFA is an effective treatment in patients who report ≥80% symptom relief with dual concordant MBBs. The present study demonstrated an overall ≥50% pain reduction rate of 54% and no significant difference between those selected by 80-99% vs 100% symptom relief with dual concordant MBBs.

摘要

背景

根据脊柱介入协会(SIS)指南,经双内侧支阻滞(MBB)±安慰剂阻滞症状改善100%的患者,颈椎内侧支射频消融术(CMBRFA)是治疗小关节源性疼痛的有效方法。使用双一致MBB后症状改善≥80%来选择CMBRFA治疗的患者很常见;然而,尚未对此进行研究。

目的

评估CMBRFA的有效性,并比较双一致MBB症状改善80 - 99%与100%的患者的治疗结果。

设计

横断面队列研究。

方法

回顾了87例连续患者的病历;50例符合纳入标准。在CMBRFA术后6个月或更长时间进行标准化电话调查,询问数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分和患者总体变化印象(PGIC)评分。主要结局是报告指数疼痛减轻≥50%的患者比例。

结果

平均随访时间为16.9±12.7个月,80 - 99%和100% MBB组分别有54%(95%置信区间[CI]=35 - 73%)和54%(95% CI = 32 - 74%)的患者报告疼痛减轻≥50%。组间比较显示达到主要结局的相对风险为0.99(95% CI = 0.59 - 1.66)。70%(95% CI = 56 - 81%)的患者在随访时报告PGIC评分符合“改善或显著改善”。

结论

对于双一致MBB症状缓解≥80%的患者,CMBRFA是一种有效的治疗方法。本研究表明总体疼痛减轻≥50%的比例为54%,双一致MBB症状缓解80 - 99%与100%的患者之间无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验