Lee Eun-Jae, Kim Jong S, Chang Dae-Il, Park Jong-Ho, Ahn Seong Hwan, Cha Jae-Kwan, Heo Ji Hoe, Sohn Sung-Il, Lee Byung-Chul, Kim Dong-Eog, Kim Hahn Young, Kim Seongheon, Kwon Do-Young, Kim Jei, Seo Woo-Keun, Lee Jun, Park Sang-Won, Koh Seong-Ho, Kim Jin Young, Choi-Kwon Smi
Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea,
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(1):19-25. doi: 10.1159/000506116. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
We aimed to examine sex differences in symptom characteristics and pharmacological responses in post-stroke depressive (PSD) symptoms.
This is a post hoc analysis of EMOTION (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01278498), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial that examined the efficacy of escitalopram for 3 months on depression in patients with acute stroke. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the 10-item Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Baseline characteristics, clinical variables, and treatment responses to escitalopram were compared between male and female patients. Treatment responses were defined as changes in MADRS (total score and its components) between baseline and 3 months and were compared between the escitalopram and placebo groups within each sex group. The least square mean was calculated to determine the independent effect of escitalopram, of which interaction was evaluated with patient sex.
Of the 478 patients (intention-to-treat population), 187 (39%) were female. Female patients were significantly older than male patients and demonstrated more severe depressive symptoms at baseline (male vs. female, MADRS score, mean [SD]: 9.7 ± 8.0 vs. 12.2 ± 8.4, p = 0.001), especially in apparent sadness, reported sadness, and reduced appetite items. These differences were significant after adjustment for age and the severity of neurologic deficits. The female escitalopram group showed a significant 3-month improvement in MADRS scores (placebo [n = 86] vs. escitalopram [n = 101], least square mean [95% CI] -2.7 [-4.1 to -1.2] vs. -5.0 [-6.4 to -3.6], p = 0.007), and this efficacy was prominent in apparent sadness, reported sadness, and pessimistic thoughts items. However, there was no significant effect of escitalopram on depressive symptoms in the male group. The treatment responses of escitalopram tended to be more pronounced in the female group, particularly in alleviating a subset of depressive symptoms such as apparent sadness (p for interaction = 0.009).
PSD may differ according to sex in its symptom characteristics and treatment responses to escitalopram, and tailored treatment strategies for PSD may therefore be needed.
我们旨在研究中风后抑郁(PSD)症状的特征及药物反应中的性别差异。
这是对EMOTION(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01278498)研究的一项事后分析,EMOTION是一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验,研究了艾司西酞普兰对急性中风患者抑郁症状3个月的疗效。使用10项蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估抑郁症状。比较了男性和女性患者的基线特征、临床变量以及对艾司西酞普兰的治疗反应。治疗反应定义为基线至3个月期间MADRS(总分及其各分量表)的变化,并在每个性别组内的艾司西酞普兰组和安慰剂组之间进行比较。计算最小二乘均值以确定艾司西酞普兰的独立效应,并评估其与患者性别的相互作用。
在478例患者(意向性治疗人群)中,187例(39%)为女性。女性患者显著比男性患者年龄大,且在基线时表现出更严重的抑郁症状(男性与女性,MADRS评分,均值[标准差]:9.7±8.0 vs. 12.2±8.4,p = 0.001),尤其是在明显悲伤、自述悲伤和食欲减退项目上。在调整年龄和神经功能缺损严重程度后,这些差异仍然显著。女性艾司西酞普兰组在3个月时MADRS评分有显著改善(安慰剂[n = 86] vs. 艾司西酞普兰[n = 101],最小二乘均值[95%置信区间] -2.7 [-4.1至-1.2] vs. -5.0 [-6.4至-3.6],p = 0.007),且这种疗效在明显悲伤、自述悲伤和消极想法项目上尤为突出。然而,艾司西酞普兰对男性组的抑郁症状没有显著影响。艾司西酞普兰的治疗反应在女性组中往往更明显,特别是在缓解某些抑郁症状如明显悲伤方面(交互作用p = 0.009)。
PSD在症状特征和对艾司西酞普兰的治疗反应方面可能存在性别差异,因此可能需要针对PSD制定个性化的治疗策略。