Suppr超能文献

赛马中的马的视觉与障碍物可见性

Horse vision and obstacle visibility in horseracing.

作者信息

Paul Sarah Catherine, Stevens Martin

机构信息

Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.

出版信息

Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020 Jan;222:104882. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104882.

Abstract

Visual information is key to how many animals interact with their environment, and much research has investigated how animals respond to colour and brightness information in the natural world. Understanding the visibility of features in anthropogenic environments, and how animals respond to these, is also important, not least for the welfare and safety of animals and the humans they co-exist with, but has received comparatively less attention. One area where this is particularly pertinent is animal sports such as horseracing. Here there is a need to understand how horses see and respond to obstacles, predominantly fences and hurdles, as this has implications for horse and rider safety, however obstacle appearance is currently designed to human perception. Using models of horse colour and luminance (perceived lightness) vision, we analysed the contrast of traditional orange markers currently used on fences from 11 UK racecourses, and compared this to potential alternative colours, while also investigating the effect of light and weather conditions on contrast. We found that for horses, orange has poor visibility and contrast against most surroundings. In comparison, yellow, blue, and white are more conspicuous, with the degree of relative contrast varying with vegetation or background type. Results were mostly consistent under different weather conditions and time of day, except for comparisons with the foreground turf in shade. We then tested the jump responses of racehorses to fences with orange, fluorescent yellow, bright blue, or white takeoff boards and midrails. Fence colour influenced both the angle of the jump and the distances jumped. Bright blue produced a larger angle of takeoff, and jumps over fluorescent yellow fences had shorter landing distances compared to orange, with bright blue fences driving a similar but non-significant trend. White was the only colour that influenced takeoff distances, with horses jumping over white fences having a larger takeoff distance. Overall, our results show that current obstacle coloration does not maximise contrast for horse vision, and that alternative colours may improve visibility and alter behavioural responses, with the ultimate goal of improving safety and welfare.

摘要

视觉信息对于许多动物与环境的互动至关重要,许多研究都探讨了动物如何对自然界中的颜色和亮度信息做出反应。了解人为环境中特征的可见性以及动物如何对此做出反应也很重要,这不仅关乎动物及其共存的人类的福利和安全,然而相对而言却较少受到关注。动物运动领域,如赛马,就是一个特别相关的领域。在此,有必要了解马如何看待并对障碍物(主要是围栏和跨栏)做出反应,因为这关系到马和骑手的安全,然而目前障碍物的外观设计是基于人类的感知。我们利用马的颜色和亮度(感知明度)视觉模型,分析了英国11个赛马场围栏上目前使用的传统橙色标记的对比度,并将其与潜在的替代颜色进行比较,同时还研究了光照和天气条件对对比度的影响。我们发现,对马来说,橙色在大多数环境中的可见性和对比度都很差。相比之下,黄色、蓝色和白色更显眼,相对对比度的程度会因植被或背景类型而异。除了与阴凉处的前景草皮进行比较外,不同天气条件和一天中的不同时间的结果大多一致。然后,我们测试了赛马对带有橙色、荧光黄色、亮蓝色或白色起跳板和中间栏杆的围栏的跳跃反应。围栏颜色影响了跳跃角度和跳跃距离。亮蓝色产生的起跳角度更大,与橙色相比,越过荧光黄色围栏的着陆距离更短,亮蓝色围栏也呈现出类似但不显著的趋势。白色是唯一影响起跳距离的颜色,马越过白色围栏时起跳距离更大。总体而言,我们的结果表明,目前障碍物的颜色并没有使马的视觉对比度最大化,替代颜色可能会提高可见性并改变行为反应,最终目标是提高安全性和福利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9a/6988441/de9df132401d/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验