Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Laboratory for Reproductive Immunology, Hospital & Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dis Markers. 2020 Jan 13;2020:7815214. doi: 10.1155/2020/7815214. eCollection 2020.
The precise pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia (PE) and preventative strategies remain unknown. Laboratory markers which can help in identifying PE patients from pregnant women and assessing the severity of PE during pregnancy are worthy to be explored. In this study, a retrospective case-control study was designed to assess whether the serum levels of albumin (ALB), total protein (TP), prealbumin (PA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, fibrinogen (Fbg), platelet (PLT) count, mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW) can help in assessing PE and evaluate its severity. 256 pregnant women were enrolled and classified into 3 groups: mild preeclampsia (mPE, = 85), severe preeclampsia (sPE, = 78), and healthy normotensive controls (control, = 93). Our result showed that the serum levels of ALP, LDH, and D-dimer were significantly higher in mild or severe PE patients compared with the healthy controls (66 (52.5-76.5) vs. 168 (141.5-201.25) vs. 182.5 (120-191.5), 152 (139.75-166.25) vs. 183.5 (163.25-307) vs. 282 (215.25-306), 1.05 (0.65-1.57) vs. 3.05 (2.25-4.08) vs. 5.65 (2.29-7.71)), while ALB, TP, and PA are lower (38 (37-42) vs. 31.5 (25.5-34.5) vs. 28.5 (24-33), 65 (63-68.25) vs. 56.5 (52-61) vs. 51.5 (49-58), 219.14 ± 68.25 vs. 167.88 ± 52.21 vs. 143.22 ± 50.46). On the other hand, compared with the mPE group, the sPE group showed significantly lower PLT count but higher level of LDH, D-dimer, and Fbg. No significant differences in MPV or PDW were found between any of the two groups. In conclusion, the above markers except for the MPV and PDW may be correlated with PE severity in this patient cohort, indicating possible values of these potential biomarkers in auxiliary diagnosis and severity assessment of PE.
子痫前期(PE)的确切病理生理机制和预防策略仍不清楚。有助于将孕妇与 PE 患者区分开来并评估妊娠期 PE 严重程度的实验室标志物值得探索。在这项研究中,设计了一项回顾性病例对照研究,以评估血清白蛋白(ALB)、总蛋白(TP)、前白蛋白(PA)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、D-二聚体、纤维蛋白原(Fbg)、血小板(PLT)计数、平均血小板体积(MPV)和血小板分布宽度(PDW)水平是否有助于评估 PE 并评估其严重程度。共纳入 256 名孕妇,并将其分为 3 组:轻度子痫前期(mPE,n=85)、重度子痫前期(sPE,n=78)和健康正常血压对照组(对照组,n=93)。我们的结果表明,与健康对照组相比,轻度或重度 PE 患者的血清 ALP、LDH 和 D-二聚体水平显著升高(66(52.5-76.5)比 168(141.5-201.25)比 182.5(120-191.5),152(139.75-166.25)比 183.5(163.25-307)比 282(215.25-306),1.05(0.65-1.57)比 3.05(2.25-4.08)比 5.65(2.29-7.71)),而 ALB、TP 和 PA 水平较低(38(37-42)比 31.5(25.5-34.5)比 28.5(24-33),65(63-68.25)比 56.5(52-61)比 51.5(49-58),219.14±68.25 比 167.88±52.21 比 143.22±50.46)。另一方面,与 mPE 组相比,sPE 组的 PLT 计数明显较低,但 LDH、D-二聚体和 Fbg 水平较高。两组之间的 MPV 或 PDW 无显著差异。总之,除了 MPV 和 PDW 外,上述标志物可能与该患者队列的 PE 严重程度相关,表明这些潜在生物标志物在辅助诊断和评估 PE 严重程度方面具有潜在价值。