• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级心脏护理中心经桡动脉途径进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果

Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention through a Transradial Approach in a Tertiary Care Cardiac Center.

作者信息

Soomro Najia A, Khan Muhammad N, Naseeb Khalid, Batra Mahesh K, Majeed Haris, Bhatti Usman, Ashraf Tariq, Karim Musa

机构信息

Cardiology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Interventional Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2019 Dec 27;11(12):e6484. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6484.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.6484
PMID:32025407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6984168/
Abstract

Background Transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is gaining popularity due to lesser bleeding and other access site related complications. This study aims to determine the in-hospital outcomes of primary PCI through a transradial approach in a tertiary care cardiac center. Methods Consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting within 12 hours with symptoms without a previous history of thrombolytic therapy, coronary angioplasty, or cardiac surgery were included in the study. All patients underwent a diagnostic angiogram followed by primary PCI of the infarct-related artery through a radial route and were kept under observation during the hospital stay for forearm hematoma or mortality. Results A total of 180 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 52.04±7.31 years. Majority (87.2%) of the patients were male, and diabetes (72.8%) was the most commonly observed co-morbid condition followed by hypertension (67.2%). Hospital mortality rate was 3.9% (7 patients), and post-procedure forearm hematoma was noted in 5.6% (10 patients). An increased mortality rate was found to be associated with age above 50 years (7.1% vs. 0.0%; p=0.012) and non-hypertension (8.5% vs. 1.7%; p=0.026). An increased incidence of forearm hematoma was found to be associated with age above 50 years (10.2% vs. 0.0%; p=0.002), diabetic mellitus (7.6% vs. 0.0%; p=0.047), hyperlipidemia (11% vs. 0.0%; p=0.001), and non-smoking (10.2% vs. 0.0%; p=0.003). Conclusion Our study showed that primary PCI through a transradial approach is a safe option with excellent success rates in terms of both mortality rates and morbidity such as forearm hematoma.

摘要

背景 经桡动脉途径进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)因出血较少及其他与穿刺部位相关的并发症而越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在确定在一家三级心脏护理中心通过经桡动脉途径进行直接PCI的院内结局。方法 连续纳入发病12小时内出现症状、既往无溶栓治疗、冠状动脉成形术或心脏手术史的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者。所有患者均接受诊断性血管造影,随后通过桡动脉途径对梗死相关动脉进行直接PCI,并在住院期间观察前臂血肿或死亡率。结果 本研究共纳入180例患者,平均年龄为52.04±7.31岁。大多数患者(87.2%)为男性,最常见的合并症是糖尿病(72.8%),其次是高血压(67.2%)。医院死亡率为3.9%(7例患者),术后前臂血肿发生率为5.6%(10例患者)。发现死亡率增加与年龄超过50岁(7.1%对0.0%;p=0.012)和非高血压(8.5%对1.7%;p=0.026)相关。发现前臂血肿发生率增加与年龄超过50岁(10.2%对0.0%;p=0.002)、糖尿病(7.6%对

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention through a Transradial Approach in a Tertiary Care Cardiac Center.三级心脏护理中心经桡动脉途径进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Cureus. 2019 Dec 27;11(12):e6484. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6484.
2
Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience.桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性:单中心经验
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):531-537. doi: 10.1159/000517076. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Sheathless guide catheter in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.无鞘导引导管在经桡动脉行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;87(6):1111-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26144. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
4
Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死患者经桡动脉途径行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性与可行性
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 5;121(9):782-6.
5
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy.经溶栓治疗后行补救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中行桡动脉入路与股动脉入路的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.028.
6
Impact of Access Site on Periprocedural Bleeding and Cerebral and Coronary Events in High-Bleeding-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the RIVA-PCI Trial.穿刺部位对高出血风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期出血及脑卒中和冠状动脉事件的影响:RIVA-PCI试验结果
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Mar;13(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00343-4. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
7
Thrombolysis Followed by Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Transradial Artery Approach in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经桡动脉途径行早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后进行溶栓治疗
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014 Jul;30(4):284-91.
8
Effect on door-to-balloon time of immediate transradial percutaneous coronary intervention on culprit lesion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to diagnostic angiography followed by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经桡动脉入路与诊断性冠状动脉造影后行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗比较,对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死罪犯病变门球时间的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 15;111(6):836-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.059. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
9
Transradial vs Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.经桡动脉与经股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Jun;32(6):777-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
10
Vascular Complications of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Via Distal Radial Artery Approach in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗通过远端桡动脉途径治疗急性 ST 段抬高型和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的血管并发症。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Apr;34(4):E259-E265. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00411. Epub 2022 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Forearm hematoma as a complication of transradial coronary intervention: an Indian single-center experience.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗并发症之前臂血肿:一项印度单中心经验
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):462-470. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention: More Comfort, Better Outcome.经桡动脉途径进行冠状动脉介入治疗:更舒适,预后更佳。
Korean Circ J. 2018 Aug;48(8):728-730. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0118.
2
Temporal changes in radial access use, associates and outcomes in patients undergoing PCI using rotational atherectomy between 2007 and 2014: results from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society national database.2007 年至 2014 年期间,使用旋转削切术行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,桡动脉入路使用、相关因素和结局的时间变化:来自英国心血管介入学会国家数据库的结果。
Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
3
Transradial Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Lessons from a High-volume Centre.经桡动脉途径在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:来自高手术量中心的经验教训。
Interv Cardiol. 2016 Oct;11(2):88-92. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:21:3.
4
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
5
Mortality pattern and cause of death in a long-term follow-up of patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期随访中的死亡率模式及死因
Open Heart. 2016 Apr 15;3(1):e000405. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000405. eCollection 2016.
6
2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.2015年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会关于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的重点更新:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南及2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南的更新
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1235-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Access and non-access site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events: systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后穿刺部位与非穿刺部位出血及后续死亡风险和主要不良心血管事件:系统评价与荟萃分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001645.
8
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
Increasing percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: progress and opportunity.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的现状:进展与机遇。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention in treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的多支冠状动脉疾病
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(2):136-45. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.35448. Epub 2013 Jun 17.