• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估急性髋部骨折患者就诊于急诊科后转入病房的时间:一项闭环审核。

Assessing the Time to Ward Transfer in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with an Acute Hip Fracture: A Closed-loop Audit.

作者信息

Grant-Freemantle Marc C, Kenyon Robert M, Gibbons John, Flynn Sean O, Davey Martin, Burke Neil

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, IRL.

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, IRL.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Jan 28;12(1):e6794. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6794.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.6794
PMID:32025448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6988480/
Abstract

Introduction The British Orthopaedic Association and British Geriatric Association Blue Book guidelines for patients presenting acutely with a hip fracture stipulate that the patient should be admitted to an acute orthopedic ward within four hours of presentation to the emergency department (ED).  Materials and methods A retrospective review of all patients who presented to the ED with a hip fracture diagnosed on plain film X-Ray over an eight-week period by a single auditor. Time of arrival, time to X-ray, time of blood draw, time to orthopedic referral, time to orthopedic review, and time to arrival at the orthopedic ward were documented. A policy change stipulating that orthopedics on call would prospectively review potential hip fracture patients prior to definitive workup was initiated. The same parameters were re-audited following this intervention over a six-week period. Results Pre-intervention, the mean time to orthopedic review was 83 minutes with a mean time to ward of 417 minutes. Post-intervention, the mean time to orthopedic review was 76 minutes with a mean time to ward of 333 minutes. When orthopedic trainees were on call, the mean time to review was 37.5 minutes with a mean time to ward of 294 minutes. Conclusions While we were able to demonstrate an improvement in orthopedic response times, this did not significantly improve time to ward transfer. This highlights a number of other areas that need to be optimized to improve compliance with best practice guidelines.

摘要

引言 英国骨科协会和英国老年医学协会针对急性髋部骨折患者的蓝皮书指南规定,患者应在就诊于急诊科(ED)后的4小时内被收入急性骨科病房。材料与方法 由一名审核员对在八周内就诊于ED且经X线平片诊断为髋部骨折的所有患者进行回顾性研究。记录到达时间、进行X线检查的时间、采血时间、转至骨科的时间、接受骨科检查的时间以及到达骨科病房的时间。实施一项政策变更,规定随叫随到的骨科医生在进行最终检查之前要对潜在的髋部骨折患者进行前瞻性评估。在这一干预措施实施后的六周内,对相同参数进行重新审核。结果 干预前,接受骨科检查的平均时间为83分钟,到达病房的平均时间为417分钟。干预后,接受骨科检查的平均时间为76分钟,到达病房的平均时间为333分钟。当骨科实习医生随叫随到的时候,检查的平均时间为37.5分钟,到达病房的平均时间为294分钟。结论 虽然我们能够证明骨科反应时间有所改善,但这并未显著缩短转至病房的时间。这凸显了其他一些需要优化的领域,以提高对最佳实践指南的依从性。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Time to Ward Transfer in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with an Acute Hip Fracture: A Closed-loop Audit.评估急性髋部骨折患者就诊于急诊科后转入病房的时间:一项闭环审核。
Cureus. 2020 Jan 28;12(1):e6794. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6794.
2
Optimizing orthopedic trauma care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. A closed-loop audit of implementing a virtual fracture clinic and fast-track pathway in a Dutch level 2 trauma center.在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间优化骨科创伤护理服务。荷兰一家二级创伤中心实施虚拟骨折诊所和快速通道的闭环审计。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Oct 4;6(1):e000691. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000691. eCollection 2021.
3
The long-term effect of being treated in a geriatric ward compared to an orthopaedic ward on six measures of free-living physical behavior 4 and 12 months after a hip fracture - a randomised controlled trial.骨科病房与老年病房治疗对髋部骨折后 4 个月和 12 个月 6 项自由生活身体行为测量的长期影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Dec 4;15:160. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0153-6.
4
Audit of standards of practice in suspected hip fracture.疑似髋部骨折的实践标准审核
Int Emerg Nurs. 2012 Oct;20(4):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
5
Management of hip fractures in older people in Beijing: a retrospective audit and comparison with evidence-based guidelines and practice in the UK.北京老年人髋部骨折的管理:一项回顾性审计以及与英国循证指南和实践的比较
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):677-81. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3261-4. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
6
The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial).术前及术后老年骨科服务对髋部骨折患者认知功能的影响:随机对照试验(奥斯陆老年骨科试验)
BMC Med. 2014 Apr 15;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-63.
7
The effect of a multidisciplinary co-management program for the older hip fracture patients in Beijing: a "pre- and post-" retrospective study.多学科协作管理方案对北京老年髋部骨折患者的影响:一项“前后”回顾性研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Mar 22;14(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0594-1.
8
Impact of an Orthopedic-Delivered 'One-Stop' Clinic for Ambulatory Trauma on Emergency Department and Fracture Clinic Pressures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.骨科提供的“一站式”门诊对新冠疫情期间急诊科和骨折门诊压力的影响
Cureus. 2021 May 24;13(5):e15207. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15207.
9
Comparison between a multicentre, collaborative, closed-loop audit assessing management of supracondylar fractures and the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma 11 (BOAST 11) guidelines.一项评估髁上骨折治疗的多中心、协作性、闭环审计与英国骨科协会创伤标准11(BOAST 11)指南之间的比较。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Mar 1;100-B(3):346-351. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0780.R2.
10
Use of CT Vs. MRI for Diagnosis of Hip or Pelvic Fractures in Elderly Patients After Low Energy Trauma.低能量创伤后老年患者髋部或骨盆骨折诊断中CT与MRI的应用比较
Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):179-183.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能在髋部骨折检测和预后预测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233391. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3391.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Analgesia for Prehospital hip Disruption (RAPID): findings from a randomised feasibility study.院前髋部骨折快速镇痛(RAPID):一项随机可行性研究的结果
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jun 12;5:77. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0454-1. eCollection 2019.
2
Fast track hip fracture care and mortality - an observational study of 2230 patients.快速通道髋部骨折护理与死亡率 - 2230 例患者的观察性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 24;20(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2637-6.
3
Emergency Department Overcrowding And The Full Capacity Protocol Cross Over Study: What Patients Who Have Experienced Both Think About Being An Extra Patient In The Emergency Department Or On A Ward.急诊科拥挤与满负荷协议交叉研究:经历过这两种情况的患者对自己成为急诊科或病房额外患者的看法。
Ir Med J. 2018 Aug 13;111(7):788.
4
The effect of indirect admission via hospital transfer on hip fracture patients in Ireland.通过医院转诊进行间接入院对爱尔兰髋部骨折患者的影响。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):517-524. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1854-6. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
Patient and system factors of time to surgery after hip fracture: a scoping review.髋部骨折后手术时间的患者和系统因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016939.
6
Improving time to surgery for hip fracture patients. Impact of the introduction of an emergency theatre.缩短髋部骨折患者的手术时间。引入急诊手术室的影响。
Ir Med J. 2017 Jan 11;110(1):498.
7
Does achieving the best practice tariff improve outcomes in hip fracture patients? An observational cohort study.达到最佳实践收费标准是否能改善髋部骨折患者的治疗效果?一项观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 6;7(2):e014190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014190.
8
Reducing mortality from hip fractures: a systematic quality improvement programme.降低髋部骨折死亡率:一项系统性质量改进计划。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Sep 19;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u205006.w2103. eCollection 2014.
9
Emergency surgery in the elderly: challenges and solutions.老年患者的急诊手术:挑战与解决方案
Open Access Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 8;7:55-68. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S68324. eCollection 2015.
10
Prehospital fast track care for patients with hip fracture: Impact on time to surgery, hospital stay, post-operative complications and mortality a randomised, controlled trial.髋部骨折患者的院前快速通道护理:对手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症及死亡率的影响——一项随机对照试验
Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Feb 8.