Suppr超能文献

右心室心尖部延迟钆增强在其他正常心脏中的临床意义。

Clinical importance of late gadolinium enhancement at right ventricular insertion points in otherwise normal hearts.

机构信息

Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

Cardiovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata of Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May;36(5):913-920. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01783-y. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

Abstract

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) has an established prognostic value in otherwise normal hearts, when detected with a subepicardial or intramyocardial pattern; nevertheless, the clinical relevance of isolated right ventricular insertion point (RVIP) LGE is yet to be defined. From a retrospectively identified cohort of 2000 consecutive patients undergoing CMR, we selected 420 patients according to study's inclusion and exclusion criteria (270 males, mean age 38 ± 17 years) with apparently normal hearts: besides 36 patients with non-ischemic pattern LGE (other-LGE group), we found isolated RVIP-LGE in 44 patients and absence of LGE (no-LGE group) in 340 patients. Clinical follow-up was performed for a median of approximately 6 years. Primary composite endpoint included cardiac death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator shock. Prevalence of cardiac events was significantly lower in RVIP-LGE than in the other-LGE group (p = 0.006). Kaplan Meier curve analysis demonstrated no significant differences between patients with RVIP-LGE and no-LGE for the primary endpoint. On contrast, patients with other-LGE had worse prognosis than those with RVIP-LGE or no-LGE (p < 0.0001). RVIP-LGE in subjects without additional evidence of cardiac damage does not convey worse prognosis when compared to subjects without LGE and it should not be considered a marker of disease. Its diagnostic and prognostic significance is to be considered irrelevant.

摘要

延迟钆增强(LGE)在心外膜下或心肌内模式下在正常心脏中具有明确的预后价值;然而,孤立的右心室插入点(RVIP)LGE 的临床相关性尚未确定。从 2000 例连续接受 CMR 的回顾性确定的队列中,我们根据研究的纳入和排除标准选择了 420 例患者(270 名男性,平均年龄 38±17 岁),他们的心脏显然正常:除了 36 例非缺血性 LGE 患者(其他-LGE 组)外,我们还发现 44 例孤立的 RVIP-LGE 患者和 340 例无 LGE(无-LGE 组)患者。中位随访时间约为 6 年。主要复合终点包括心脏性死亡、心脏复苏性骤停和适当的植入式心脏除颤器电击。与其他-LGE 组相比,RVIP-LGE 患者的心脏事件发生率明显较低(p=0.006)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析显示,RVIP-LGE 患者与无-LGE 患者的主要终点无显著差异。相比之下,其他-LGE 患者的预后比 RVIP-LGE 或无-LGE 患者差(p<0.0001)。在没有其他心脏损伤证据的情况下,RVIP-LGE 患者的预后与无 LGE 患者相比没有恶化,不应将其视为疾病的标志物。其诊断和预后意义被认为是无关的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验