• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强“自我控制”:强化延迟的矛盾效应。

Enhancing "self-control": The paradoxical effect of delay of reinforcement.

作者信息

Zentall Thomas R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0044, USA.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2020 Mar;48(1):165-172. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00407-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13420-019-00407-3
PMID:32026400
Abstract

Delay of reinforcement is generally thought to be inversely correlated with speed of acquisition. However, in the case of simultaneous discrimination learning, in which choice results in immediate reinforcement, delay of reinforcement can improve acquisition. For example, in the ephemeral reward task, animals are given a choice between two alternatives, A and B. Choice of A provides reinforcement, and the trial is over. Choice of B provides reinforcement and access to alternative A (thus, two reinforcements). Many animals appear unable to learn to choose B consistently, but inserting a 20-s delay between choice and outcome has been shown to facilitate optimal choice. Similarly, pigeons given a choice between a signal for one pellet and a signal for two pellets (each occurring without a delay) have difficulty learning to choose the two-pellet alternative, unless the reinforcement is delayed. In a version of object permanence, food is placed in one of two containers, and the pigeon must choose the container with the food. Pigeons have difficulty reliably choosing the correct container unless a brief delay is inserted between baiting and choice. Finally, pigeons have been shown to prefer a suboptimal alternative (a 20% chance of getting a cue for reinforcement) over an optimal alternative (a 100% chance of getting a cue for 50% reinforcement). However, if pigeons are forced to wait 20 s following their choice to receive the cues, no preference for the suboptimal alternative is found. Thus, impulsive choice may be reduced by delaying the consequence of that choice.

摘要

强化延迟通常被认为与习得速度呈负相关。然而,在同时辨别学习的情况下,即选择会立即得到强化,强化延迟却可以改善习得情况。例如,在短暂奖励任务中,动物要在两个选项A和B之间做出选择。选择A会得到强化,试验结束。选择B会得到强化并可选择选项A(因此,有两次强化)。许多动物似乎无法学会始终选择B,但在选择和结果之间插入20秒的延迟已被证明有助于做出最优选择。同样,让鸽子在一个食丸信号和两个食丸信号之间做出选择(每个信号出现时都无延迟),它们很难学会选择两个食丸的选项,除非强化延迟。在一个客体永久性的版本中,食物被放在两个容器中的一个里,鸽子必须选择装有食物的容器。除非在放置诱饵和选择之间插入短暂延迟,否则鸽子很难可靠地选择正确的容器。最后,已证明鸽子更喜欢次优选项(有20%的机会得到强化提示)而不是最优选项(有100%的机会得到50%强化的提示)。然而,如果鸽子在做出选择后被迫等待20秒才能收到提示,就不会发现它们对次优选项有偏好。因此,通过延迟选择的结果可能会减少冲动选择。

相似文献

1
Enhancing "self-control": The paradoxical effect of delay of reinforcement.增强“自我控制”:强化延迟的矛盾效应。
Learn Behav. 2020 Mar;48(1):165-172. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00407-3.
2
Pigeons can learn a difficult discrimination if reinforcement is delayed following choice.如果在选择后延迟强化,鸽子可以学习到困难的辨别。
Anim Cogn. 2020 May;23(3):503-508. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01352-9. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
The paradoxical performance by different species on the ephemeral reward task.不同物种在短暂奖励任务中的矛盾表现。
Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):99-105. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00429-2.
4
Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.早期的倾向有助于鸽子做出最佳选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):957-963. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1173-8.
5
Prior commitment: Its effect on suboptimal choice in a gambling-like task.先前承诺:其对类似赌博任务中次优选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2017 Dec;145:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
6
The Midsession Reversal Task with Pigeons Does a Brief Delay Between Choice and Reinforcement Facilitate Reversal Learning?鸽子的中期反转任务 选择与强化之间的短暂延迟是否有助于反转学习?
Behav Processes. 2020 Aug;177:104150. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104150. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Inhibition and paradoxical choice.抑制与矛盾选择。
Learn Behav. 2023 Dec;51(4):458-467. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00584-2. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Rats' acquisition of the ephemeral reward task.大鼠对短暂奖励任务的习得
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1065-3. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
9
How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?次优选择有多不理想?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jan;107(1):136-150. doi: 10.1002/jeab.239.
10
The Δ-∑ hypothesis: How contrast and reinforcement rate combine to generate suboptimal choice.Δ-Σ 假说:对比和强化率如何结合产生次优选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 May;113(3):591-608. doi: 10.1002/jeab.595. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Object permanence in the pigeon (Columba livia): Insertion of a delay prior to choice facilitates visible- and invisible-displacement accuracy.鸽子(家鸽)的客体永久性:在选择之前插入延迟有助于提高可见和不可见位移任务的准确性。
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Feb;133(1):132-139. doi: 10.1037/com0000134. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
2
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?鸽子的次优选择:仅条件强化物的预测价值就能决定选择吗?
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Prior commitment: Its effect on suboptimal choice in a gambling-like task.
先前承诺:其对类似赌博任务中次优选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2017 Dec;145:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Rats' acquisition of the ephemeral reward task.大鼠对短暂奖励任务的习得
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1065-3. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
5
Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.早期的倾向有助于鸽子做出最佳选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):957-963. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1173-8.
6
Pigeon's (Columba livia) paradoxical preference for the suboptimal alternative in a complex foraging task.鸽子(家鸽)在复杂觅食任务中对次优选择的矛盾偏好。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 May;130(2):138-44. doi: 10.1037/com0000026. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
7
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.鸽子的次优选择:选择主要基于条件性强化物的价值,而非整体强化率。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20. doi: 10.1037/xan0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
8
Pigeons' delay discounting functions established using a concurrent-chains procedure.使用并发链程序建立的鸽子延迟折扣函数。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Sep;102(2):151-61. doi: 10.1002/jeab.97. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
9
Suboptimal choice by pigeons may result from the diminishing effect of nonreinforcement.鸽子的次优选择可能源于无强化作用的递减效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-21. doi: 10.1037/xan0000010.
10
Can grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) succeed on a "complex" foraging task failed by nonhuman primates (Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii, Sapajus apella) but solved by wrasse fish (Labroides dimidiatus)?非洲灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)能在一项被非人灵长类动物(黑猩猩Pan troglodytes、苏门答腊猩猩Pongo abelii、白脸僧面猴Sapajus apella)搞砸但被裂唇鱼(Labroides dimidiatus)解决的“复杂”觅食任务中取得成功吗?
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Aug;128(3):298-306. doi: 10.1037/a0036205. Epub 2014 May 5.