Seinturier Christophe, Blaise Sophie, Tiffet Théophile, Provencher Cynthia Brousseau, Cracowski Jean Luc, Pernod Gilles, Carpentier Patrick
Department of Vascular Medicine, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Clinical Pharmacology Department, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Vasa. 2020 Apr;49(3):230-234. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000853. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
: Severity of limb ischemia in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients is usually evaluated by clinical assessment and toe blood pressure (TBP) or transcutaneous oxygen pressures (TcPO 2). Indocyanin green angiography (IGA) is a promising tool generating a foot cartography of skin microvascular perfusion. However, there is no consensus about the fluorescence parameters that should be used to evaluate ischemia. The purpose of this cross-sectional evaluation and 3-month clinical follow-up was to determine the best fluorescence parameter for the evaluation of severe PAD, using TBP as reference. : IGA was realized in patients with clinical suspicion of CLI in addition to TBP and TcPO 2. Parameters from the time intensity fluorescence curve measured on the foot were compared with TBP (primary reference), and with TcPO2. Clinical outcomes (amputation, revascularization, death) were recorded at 3 months follow-up. : Thirty-four patients were included and IGA could be analysed in 29 of them. When all limbs were studied, no significant correlation was found between any of the measured fluorescence parameters (saturation time, ingress slope, amplitude, delay) and TBP pressure neither TCPO2. In the limbs with CLI, a significant correlation between the TBP and amplitude on the forefoot was found. According to the outcome, none of the fluorescence parameters showed a significant prognostic value in contrast to the significant results for TBP and TcPO2. : In this study, quantitative analysis of IGA parameters did not show any prognostic value, nor was there any significant statistical association with well-established prognostic parameters such as TBP and TcPO 2 in patients with suspected CLI. A correlation was found between amplitude and TBP in patients with CLI. Topographical information such as perfusion heterogeneity was not evaluated and remains a valuable target to be investigated.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者肢体缺血的严重程度通常通过临床评估以及趾血压(TBP)或经皮氧分压(TcPO₂)来评估。吲哚菁绿血管造影(IGA)是一种很有前景的工具,可生成足部皮肤微血管灌注图谱。然而,对于用于评估缺血的荧光参数尚无共识。本横断面评估及3个月临床随访的目的是以TBP为参照,确定评估重度PAD的最佳荧光参数。
除TBP和TcPO₂外,对临床怀疑为慢性肢体缺血(CLI)的患者进行IGA检查。将足部测量的时间强度荧光曲线参数与TBP(主要参照)以及TcPO₂进行比较。在3个月随访时记录临床结局(截肢、血运重建、死亡)。
纳入34例患者,其中29例可进行IGA分析。对所有肢体进行研究时,未发现任何测量的荧光参数(饱和时间、入射斜率、幅度、延迟)与TBP压力或TcPO₂之间存在显著相关性。在CLI肢体中,发现前足TBP与幅度之间存在显著相关性。根据结局,与TBP和TcPO₂的显著结果相比,荧光参数均未显示出显著的预后价值。
在本研究中,IGA参数的定量分析未显示任何预后价值,在疑似CLI的患者中,也未发现与TBP和TcPO₂等已确立的预后参数存在任何显著的统计学关联。在CLI患者中发现幅度与TBP之间存在相关性。未评估灌注异质性等地形信息,其仍是有待研究的重要目标。