School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7QG, United Kingdom; NHS Grampian, Physiotherapy Outpatient Department, Woodend Hospital, Eday Road, Aberdeen AB15 6XS, United Kingdom.
School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7QG, United Kingdom.
Physiotherapy. 2020 Mar;106:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
Respiratory muscle strength declines in certain disease states, leading to impaired cough, reduced airway clearance and an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia. Respiratory muscle training may therefore reduce this risk.
To assess current evidence of expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) on maximum expiratory pressure, cough flow and spirometry.
Databases including CINAHL, Medline, Science Direct and PEDRo were searched.
Randomised controlled trials investigating expiratory muscle strength training on maximum expiratory pressure, pulmonary function or cough in any adult population, published before December 2017.
Data were extracted to a trial description form and study quality evaluated by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed with calculation of mean differences and 95% confidence intervals.
Nine studies met inclusion criteria and ranged in size from 12 to 42 participants. Trials investigated EMST in healthy adults (2), multiple sclerosis (3), COPD (2), acute stroke (1) and spinal cord injury (1). Overall, EMST improved maximum expiratory pressure (15.95cmHO; 95% CI: 7.77 to 24.12; P<0.01) with no significant impact on cough flow (4.63L/minute; 95%CI -27.48 to 36.74; P=0.78), forced vital capacity (-0.16L; 95%CI -0.35 to 0.02; P=0.09) or forced expiratory volume in 1second (-0.09L; 95%CI -0.10 to -0.08; P<0.001) vs control or sham training.
Meta-analysis indicated a small significant increase in maximum expiratory pressure following EMST. Improvements in maximum expiratory pressure did not lead to improvements in cough or pulmonary function.
Variations in protocol design and population limited the overall effect size. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO CRD42018104190.
在某些疾病状态下,呼吸肌力量下降,导致咳嗽无力、气道清除能力降低以及肺炎吸入风险增加。因此,呼吸肌训练可能会降低这种风险。
评估呼气肌力量训练(EMST)对最大呼气压力、咳嗽流量和肺活量的影响。
检索了 CINAHL、Medline、Science Direct 和 PEDRo 等数据库。
研究对象为任何成人人群,随机对照试验研究呼气肌力量训练对最大呼气压力、肺功能或咳嗽的影响,发表时间在 2017 年 12 月之前。
将数据提取到试验描述表中,由两名评审员评估研究质量。采用 Meta 分析计算均数差和 95%置信区间。
9 项研究符合纳入标准,试验规模从 12 例到 42 例不等。试验研究对象包括健康成年人(2 项)、多发性硬化症(3 项)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(2 项)、急性中风(1 项)和脊髓损伤(1 项)。总体而言,EMST 可改善最大呼气压力(15.95cmH2O;95%CI:7.77 至 24.12;P<0.01),但对咳嗽流量(4.63L/min;95%CI:-27.48 至 36.74;P=0.78)、用力肺活量(-0.16L;95%CI:-0.35 至 0.02;P=0.09)或 1 秒用力呼气量(-0.09L;95%CI:-0.10 至 -0.08;P<0.001)无显著影响,与对照组或假训练相比。
Meta 分析表明,EMST 后最大呼气压力有小幅显著增加。最大呼气压力的改善并未导致咳嗽或肺功能的改善。
方案设计和人群的差异限制了总体效果大小。系统评价注册 PROSPERO CRD42018104190。