Suppr超能文献

组织层面的质量管理系统是否会影响部门层面的质量?一项在澳大利亚 32 家大型医院进行的横断面研究。

Do organization-level quality management systems influence department-level quality? A cross-sectional study across 32 large hospitals in Australia.

机构信息

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011, Australia.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):35-42. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz104.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the influence that hospital quality systems have on quality at department level, in Australia and elsewhere. This study assessed the relationships between organizational-level quality management systems, and the extent to which hospital-level quality management systems and department-level quality management strategies are related.

DESIGN

A multi-level, cross-sectional, mixed-method study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

As part of the Deepening our Understanding of Quality in Australia (DUQuA) project, we invited all large hospitals in Australia (~200 or more beds) which provided acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hip fracture and stroke care. The quality managers of these hospitals were the respondents for one of seven measures of hospital quality management systems and strategies. Data across the six remaining measures were collected through site visits by external surveyors assessing the participating hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relationships were assessed between three organization-level quality management system measures: a self-report measure assessing organization-level quality activities (quality management systems index, QMSI); externally assessed organization-level compliance to procedures used to plan, monitor and improve quality of care (quality management compliance index, QMCI); and externally assessed implementation of quality systems (clinical quality implementation index, CQII). Associations were also assessed between organization-level quality management systems and department-level quality management strategies: how clinical responsibilities are assigned for a particular condition; whether department organization processes are organized to facilitate evidence-based care recommendations; compliance with selected recommendations of international agencies; and whether clinical reviews are performed systematically.

RESULTS

Of 78 invited hospitals, 32 participated in the study. QMSI was positively associated with QMCI and CQII, but after controlling for QMSI, no relationship was found between QMCI and CQII. There appears to be a cluster of relationships between QMSI and department-level measures, but this was not consistent across all departments.

CONCLUSION

This is the first national study undertaken in Australia to assess relationships within and between organization-level and department-level quality management systems. These quality management system tools align with many components of accreditation standards and may be useful for hospitals in continuously monitoring and driving improvement.

摘要

目的

在澳大利亚和其他地方,人们对医院质量体系对部门层面质量的影响知之甚少。本研究评估了组织层面质量管理系统之间的关系,以及医院层面质量管理系统和部门层面质量管理策略之间的相关程度。

设计

多水平、横断面、混合方法研究。

设置和参与者

作为深化澳大利亚质量理解(DUQuA)项目的一部分,我们邀请了澳大利亚所有大型医院(~200 张或更多床位),这些医院提供急性心肌梗死(AMI)、髋部骨折和中风护理。这些医院的质量经理是医院质量管理系统和策略的七个措施之一的应答者。通过外部调查员对参与医院的现场访问,收集了其余六个措施的数据。

主要观察指标

评估了三个组织层面质量管理系统措施之间的关系:评估组织层面质量活动的自我报告措施(质量管理系统指数,QMSI);评估组织层面遵守用于规划、监测和改进护理质量的程序的外部评估(质量管理合规指数,QMCI);以及评估质量系统的外部实施(临床质量实施指数,CQII)。还评估了组织层面质量管理系统与部门层面质量管理策略之间的关联:特定疾病的临床责任如何分配;部门组织流程是否组织为促进循证护理建议;是否遵守国际机构的选定建议;以及是否系统地进行临床审查。

结果

在 78 家受邀医院中,有 32 家参与了研究。QMSI 与 QMCI 和 CQII 呈正相关,但在控制了 QMSI 后,QMCI 和 CQII 之间没有发现关系。QMSI 与部门层面措施之间似乎存在一系列关系,但并非所有部门都一致。

结论

这是澳大利亚首次进行的评估组织层面和部门层面质量管理系统内部和之间关系的全国性研究。这些质量管理系统工具与许多认证标准的组件一致,对于医院持续监测和推动改进可能是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验