Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, NSW 2109, Australia.
Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011, Australia.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):60-66. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz107.
This study aimed to explore the associations between the organization-level quality arrangements, improvement and implementation and department-level safety culture and leadership measures across 32 large Australian hospitals.
Quantitative observational study, using linear and multi-level modelling to identify relationships between quality management systems and clinician safety culture and leadership.
Thirty-two large Australian public hospitals.
Quality audit at organization level, senior quality manager at each participating hospital, 1382 clinicians (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals).
Associations between organization-level quality measures and department-level clinician measures of teamwork climate, safety climate and leadership for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hip fracture and stroke treatment conditions.
We received 1332 valid responses from participants. The quality management systems index (QMSI, a questionnaire-based measure of the hospitals' quality management structures) was 'positively' associated with all three department-level scales in the stroke department, with safety culture and leadership in the emergency department, but with none of the three scales in the AMI and hip fracture departments. The quality management compliance index (QMCI, an external audit-based measure of the quality improvement activities) was 'negatively' associated with teamwork climate and safety climate in AMI departments, after controlling for QMSI, but not in other departments. There was no association between QMCI and leadership in any department, after controlling for QMSI, and there was no association between the clinical quality implementation index (CQII, an external audit-based measure of the level of implementation of quality activities) and any of the three department-level scales in any of the four departments, after controlling for both QMSI and QMCI.
The influence of organization-level quality management systems on clinician safety culture and leadership varied depending on the hospital department, suggesting that whilst there was some consistency on patient safety attitudes and behaviours throughout the organizations, there were also other factors at play.
本研究旨在探讨 32 家澳大利亚大型医院的组织层面质量安排、改进和实施与部门层面安全文化和领导力措施之间的关联。
使用线性和多层次建模的定量观察研究,以确定质量管理系统与临床医生安全文化和领导力之间的关系。
32 家澳大利亚大型公立医院。
组织层面的质量审核、每家参与医院的高级质量经理、1382 名临床医生(医生、护士和联合健康专业人员)。
组织层面质量措施与部门层面临床医生急性心肌梗死(AMI)、髋部骨折和中风治疗条件下的团队合作氛围、安全氛围和领导力措施之间的关联。
我们收到了 1332 名参与者的有效回复。质量管理系统指数(QMSI,一种基于问卷的医院质量管理结构的衡量标准)与中风科的所有三个部门层面量表呈“正相关”,与急诊科的安全文化和领导力呈正相关,但与 AMI 和髋部骨折科的三个量表均不相关。质量管理合规指数(QMCI,一种基于外部审计的质量改进活动的衡量标准)与 AMI 科室的团队合作氛围和安全氛围呈“负相关”,但在控制了 QMSI 之后,在其他科室则没有。在控制了 QMSI 之后,QMCI 与任何部门的领导力均无关联,在控制了 QMSI 和 QMCI 之后,CQII(一种基于外部审计的质量活动实施水平的衡量标准)与四个科室中任何一个科室的三个部门层面量表均无关联。
组织层面的质量管理系统对临床医生安全文化和领导力的影响因医院科室而异,这表明尽管整个组织在患者安全态度和行为方面存在一定的一致性,但也存在其他因素在起作用。