Laurence Paulo Guirro, Pinto Tatiana Matheus, Rosa Alexandre Tadeu Faé, Macedo Elizeu Coutinho
Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Rua Piaui, no. 181, 10th floor, São Paulo, 01241-001, Brazil.
Developmental Disorders Program, Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Jun 15;31(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0093-0.
The lexicon plays a fundamental role in reading, but little is known about how it influences reading efficiency. Thus, this study seeks to identify which lexical factors in a lexical decision task are relevant in a semantic decision test. A total of 33 university students were recruited to perform a lexical decision task and a semantic decision task. The results revealed differences between the three types of words in the lexical decision task for all measures, but only in the regressive saccades for the semantic decision task. Ambiguous sentences triggered fewer regressions than sentences related to objects. The only lexical measure found to predict efficiency was average time on regular words, which predicted 24% of the efficiency. We discuss the implications of the use of a lexical decision task and the use of the inverse efficiency score as a semantic measure, and we discuss how the lexicon can predict semantic comprehension.
词汇表在阅读中起着基础性作用,但对于它如何影响阅读效率却知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在确定在词汇判定任务中的哪些词汇因素在语义判定测试中具有相关性。总共招募了33名大学生来执行词汇判定任务和语义判定任务。结果显示,在词汇判定任务中,所有测量指标下三种类型的单词之间都存在差异,但在语义判定任务中,仅在回视扫视方面存在差异。歧义句引发的回视比与物体相关的句子要少。唯一被发现可预测效率的词汇测量指标是普通单词的平均用时,其可预测24%的效率。我们讨论了使用词汇判定任务以及使用反向效率得分作为语义测量指标的意义,并且讨论了词汇表如何能够预测语义理解。