Gvion Aviah, Friedmann Naama
Language and Brain Lab, Tel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv, Israel; Reuth Medical and Rehabilitation CenterTel Aviv, Israel; Communication Sciences and Disorders Department, Ono Academic CollegeKiryat Ono, Israel.
Language and Brain Lab, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00340. eCollection 2016.
Lexical retrieval and reading aloud are often viewed as two separate processes. However, they are not completely separate-they share components. This study assessed the effect of an impairment in a shared component, the phonological output lexicon, on lexical retrieval and on reading aloud. Because the phonological output lexicon is part of the lexical route for reading, individuals with an impairment in this lexicon may be forced to read aloud via the sublexical route and therefore show a reading pattern that is typical of surface dyslexia. To examine the effect of phonological output lexicon deficit on reading, we tested the reading of 16 Hebrew-speaking individuals with phonological output lexicon anomia, eight with acquired anomia following brain damage and eight with developmental anomia. We established that they had a phonological output lexicon deficit according to the types of errors and the effects on their naming in a picture naming task, and excluded other deficit loci in the lexical retrieval process according to a line of tests assessing their picture and word comprehension, word and non-word repetition, and phonological working memory. After we have established that the participants have a phonological output lexicon deficit, we tested their reading. To assess their reading and type of reading impairment, we tested their reading aloud, lexical decision, and written word comprehension. We found that all of the participants with phonological output lexicon impairment showed, in addition to anomia, also the typical surface dyslexia errors in reading aloud of irregular words, words with ambiguous conversion to phonemes, and potentiophones (words like "now" that, when read via the sublexical route, can be sounded out as another word, "know"). Importantly, the participants performed normally on pseudohomophone lexical decision and on homophone/potentiophone reading comprehension, indicating spared orthographic input lexicon and spared access to it and from it to lexical semantics. This pattern was shown both by the adults with acquired anomia and by the participants with developmental anomia. These results thus suggest a principled relation between anomia and dyslexia, and point to a distinct type of surface dyslexia. They further show the possibility of good comprehension of written words when the phonological output stages are impaired.
词汇检索和大声朗读通常被视为两个独立的过程。然而,它们并非完全独立——它们共享一些成分。本研究评估了一个共享成分,即语音输出词典受损,对词汇检索和大声朗读的影响。由于语音输出词典是阅读的词汇路径的一部分,该词典受损的个体可能会被迫通过次词汇路径进行大声朗读,因此会表现出典型的表层失读症的阅读模式。为了研究语音输出词典缺陷对阅读的影响,我们测试了16名说希伯来语且患有语音输出词典失命名症的个体的阅读情况,其中8名是脑损伤后获得性失命名症患者,8名是发育性失命名症患者。我们根据错误类型以及在图片命名任务中对他们命名的影响,确定他们存在语音输出词典缺陷,并根据一系列评估他们对图片和单词的理解、单词和非单词重复以及语音工作记忆的测试,排除了词汇检索过程中的其他缺陷位点。在确定参与者存在语音输出词典缺陷后,我们测试了他们的阅读情况。为了评估他们的阅读及阅读障碍类型,我们测试了他们的大声朗读、词汇判断和书面单词理解能力。我们发现,所有患有语音输出词典损伤的参与者,除了失命名症外,在大声朗读不规则单词、音素转换不明确的单词以及潜在同音词(如“now”,通过次词汇路径阅读时可发音为另一个单词“know”)时,还表现出典型的表层失读症错误。重要的是,参与者在假同音词词汇判断和同音词/潜在同音词阅读理解方面表现正常,这表明正字法输入词典未受影响,且从该词典到词汇语义的访问也未受影响。这种模式在获得性失命名症的成年人和发育性失命名症的参与者中均有体现。因此,这些结果表明了失命名症和失读症之间的原则性关系,并指出了一种独特类型的表层失读症。它们还进一步表明,当语音输出阶段受损时,对书面单词仍有可能有良好的理解。