• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低强度和高强度认知行为疗法治疗常见心理健康问题的剂量反应模式。

Dose-response patterns in low and high intensity cognitive behavioral therapy for common mental health problems.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2020 Mar;37(3):285-294. doi: 10.1002/da.22999. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1002/da.22999
PMID:32027435
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective for the treatment of common mental health problems, but the number of sessions required to maximize improvement in routine care remains unclear.

AIM

This study aimed to examine the dose-response effect in low (LiCBT) and high (HiCBT) intensity CBT delivered in stepped care services.

METHODS

A multi-service data set included N = 102 206 patients across N = 16 services. The study included patients with case-level depression and/or anxiety symptoms who accessed LiCBT and/or HiCBT. Patients with posttreatment reliable and clinically significant improvement in standardized outcome measures (PHQ-9, GAD-7) were classified as treatment responders. Survival analyses assessed the number of sessions necessary to detect 50%, 75%, and 95% of treatment responders. The 50% and 95% percentiles were used to define the lower and upper boundaries of an adequate dose of therapy that could be used to inform the timing of treatment progress reviews. Analyses were then stratified by diagnosis, and cox regression was used to identify predictors of time-to-remission.

RESULTS

Most responders (95%) attained RCSI within 7 sessions of LiCBT and 14 sessions of HiCBT. Patients with social anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder required HiCBT and lengthier treatments (6-16 sessions) to maximize improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinctive dose-response patterns are evident for LiCBT and HiCBT, which can be used to support treatment planning and routine outcome monitoring.

摘要

背景

认知行为疗法(CBT)对于治疗常见心理健康问题是有效的,但在常规护理中最大限度提高疗效所需的疗程数仍不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在检查阶梯式护理服务中低强度认知行为疗法(LiCBT)和高强度认知行为疗法(HiCBT)的剂量反应效应。

方法

多服务数据集包括来自 16 个服务的 N=102206 名患者。研究纳入了有病例水平抑郁和/或焦虑症状并接受 LiCBT 和/或 HiCBT 的患者。采用标准化结局测量(PHQ-9、GAD-7)评估患者治疗后是否出现可靠且具有临床意义的改善,将其定义为治疗反应者。生存分析评估了达到 50%、75%和 95%的治疗反应者所需的疗程数。50%和 95%的百分位数用于定义足够治疗剂量的下限和上限,可用于告知治疗进展审查的时间。然后根据诊断对分析进行分层,并使用 Cox 回归识别缓解时间的预测因素。

结果

大多数反应者(95%)在 LiCBT 的 7 次疗程内和 HiCBT 的 14 次疗程内达到 RCSI。社交焦虑障碍、创伤后应激障碍和强迫症患者需要接受 HiCBT 和更长时间的治疗(6-16 次疗程)才能最大限度地提高疗效。

结论

LiCBT 和 HiCBT 存在明显的剂量反应模式,可用于支持治疗计划和常规结局监测。

相似文献

1
Dose-response patterns in low and high intensity cognitive behavioral therapy for common mental health problems.低强度和高强度认知行为疗法治疗常见心理健康问题的剂量反应模式。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Mar;37(3):285-294. doi: 10.1002/da.22999. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
3
Outcomes of telephone-delivered low-intensity cognitive behaviour therapy (LiCBT) to community dwelling Australians with a recent hospital admission due to depression or anxiety: MindStep™.电话传递的低强度认知行为疗法(LiCBT)对因抑郁或焦虑近期住院的澳大利亚社区居民的结局:MindStep™。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1987-1.
4
A pilot study on the effectiveness of low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LiCBT) for common mental disorders in Hong Kong.一项关于低强度认知行为疗法(LiCBT)对香港常见精神障碍有效性的试点研究。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2021 Nov;49(6):758-763. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000971. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Therapist-Assisted Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Progressive Relaxation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.治疗师辅助的基于互联网的认知行为疗法与渐进性放松疗法治疗强迫症:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 8;20(8):e242. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9566.
6
Use and Engagement With Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Techniques Used Within an App to Support Worry Management: Content Analysis of Log Data.在应用程序中使用并参与低强度认知行为疗法技术以支持担忧管理:日志数据的内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 10;12:e47321. doi: 10.2196/47321.
7
The effectiveness of high-intensity CBT and counselling alone and following low-intensity CBT: a reanalysis of the 2nd UK National Audit of Psychological Therapies data.高强度认知行为疗法和单独咨询以及在低强度认知行为疗法之后的效果:对英国第二次国家心理治疗审计数据的重新分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1899-0.
8
Reassurance seeking in the anxiety disorders and OCD: Construct validation, clinical correlates and CBT treatment response.焦虑障碍和强迫症中的寻求保证行为:结构验证、临床相关性和认知行为治疗反应。
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Oct;67:102109. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102109. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
9
How durable is the effect of low intensity CBT for depression and anxiety? Remission and relapse in a longitudinal cohort study.低强度认知行为疗法治疗抑郁和焦虑的效果能持续多久?纵向队列研究中的缓解和复发。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jul;94:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
Modelling changes in anxiety and depression during low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy: An application of growth mixture models.在低强度认知行为疗法期间焦虑和抑郁变化的建模:增长混合模型的应用。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;59(2):169-185. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12237. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of psychological crisis interventions during infectious disease outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of Randomized Control Trials.低收入和中等收入国家传染病爆发期间心理危机干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Feb 26;12:e32. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.22. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychotherapy is not just for Rich White People: Outcomes for Clients from Minoritized Backgrounds and in a Community Training Clinic.心理治疗并非只适用于富有的白人:来自少数族裔背景的客户以及社区培训诊所中的客户的治疗效果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02441-6.
3
Examining the Client Experience of Digital Tools in Blended Care Therapy: Qualitative Interview Study.
审视混合式护理治疗中数字工具的客户体验:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 2;9:e68249. doi: 10.2196/68249.
4
Group arts interventions for depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对老年人抑郁和焦虑的团体艺术干预:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Nat Ment Health. 2025;3(3):374-386. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00368-1. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
5
Predicting CBT modality, treatment participation, and reliable improvements for individuals with anxiety and depression in a specialized mental health centre: a retrospective population-based cohort study.预测特定心理健康中心的焦虑和抑郁个体的认知行为治疗模式、治疗参与度和可靠改善:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 23;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05817-w.
6
Guided self-help treatment for children and young people with threshold and subthreshold eating disorders: A pilot study protocol.针对有进食障碍阈下和亚阈值症状的儿童和青少年的引导自助治疗:一项试点研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301606. eCollection 2024.
7
Time to Response in Therapy for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Comparison of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Supportive Psychotherapy.躯体变形障碍治疗中的反应时间:认知行为疗法与支持性心理疗法的比较。
Behav Ther. 2024 Jan;55(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Effectiveness of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy compared to psychosocial counseling in reducing HIV risk behaviors, substance use, and mental health problems among orphans and vulnerable children in Zambia: a community-based randomized controlled trial.创伤焦点认知行为疗法对比心理社会咨询在减少赞比亚孤儿和弱势儿童中的 HIV 风险行为、物质使用和心理健康问题的效果:一项基于社区的随机对照试验。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Jan;28(1):245-263. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04179-w. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
9
An Automatically Adaptive Digital Health Intervention to Decrease Opioid-Related Risk While Conserving Counselor Time: Quantitative Analysis of Treatment Decisions Based on Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Reported Risk Measures.一种自动适应的数字健康干预措施,可降低阿片类药物相关风险,同时节省咨询师时间:基于人工智能和患者报告风险措施的治疗决策定量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 11;25:e44165. doi: 10.2196/44165.
10
How did the Treatment Work for Robin? And for Dylan? Studying Individual Youth Treatment Mediators Using Single-Case Experimental Designs.罗宾和迪伦的治疗效果如何?使用单病例实验设计研究个体青少年治疗中介。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Sep;26(3):721-726. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00442-7. Epub 2023 Jul 5.