Suppr超能文献

骨锚式听力植入手术在儿童中的疗效:系统评价。

The efficacy of bone-anchored hearing implant surgery in children: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;132:109906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109906. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of Bone-Anchored Hearing implants (BAHIs) in children and to elucidate the usage and outcomes of new surgical techniques and implants in this specific population.

DATA SOURCES

Embase and PubMed.

STUDY SELECTION

We identified studies evaluating surgical outcomes of BAHIs in children. Retrieved articles were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical appraisal included directness of evidence and risk of bias. Studies that successfully passed critical appraisal were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Outcome measures included patient demographics, follow-up time, surgical technique (one-versus two-stage surgery), tissue handling technique (reduction versus preservation), type of implant used, and complications.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We selected 20 articles published between 2000 and 2017 for data extraction, encompassing 952 implanted BAHIs. The overall mean age at implantation was 8.6 years (range, 2-21 years). Adverse soft-tissue reactions occurred in 251 of the 952 implants (26.4%; range 0%-89% across studies). Revision surgery was performed in 16.8% (142 of the 845) of the implants. The total rate of implant loss, i.e. caused by OIF (n = 61), trauma (n = 33), recurrent infection (n = 15), elective removal due to insufficient benefit (n = 1), cosmetic reasons (n = 1), or unknown reason (n = 16), was 13.3% of the implants (127 out of 952; range 0%-40% across studies). Differences are seen in the type of implants used; wide-diameter implants seem to be superior in terms of implant survival, and similar in terms of adverse skin reactions, while one-stage surgery and soft-tissue preservation do not seem to result in higher implant loss rates or increased adverse skin reactions based upon limited amounts of literature.

CONCLUSION

In general, BAHIs are a safe method for hearing rehabilitation in children, although large differences between studies are observed. The outcomes of new surgical techniques and implant designs in the pediatric population seem promising, but more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

摘要

目的

评估骨锚定式听力植入物(BAHI)在儿童中的疗效,并阐明新手术技术和植入物在该特定人群中的使用和结果。

数据来源

Embase 和 PubMed。

研究选择

我们确定了评估儿童 BAHI 手术结果的研究。使用预设的纳入和排除标准筛选检索到的文章。批判性评价包括证据的直接性和偏倚风险。成功通过批判性评价的研究被纳入。

数据提取

结果测量包括患者人口统计学、随访时间、手术技术(单阶段与双阶段手术)、组织处理技术(减少与保留)、使用的植入物类型和并发症。

数据综合

我们选择了 20 篇发表于 2000 年至 2017 年的文章进行数据提取,共包含 952 个植入的 BAHI。植入时的总体平均年龄为 8.6 岁(范围,2-21 岁)。952 个植入物中有 251 个(26.4%;研究间范围为 0%-89%)发生了软组织不良反应。16.8%(845 个中的 142 个)的植入物需要进行修正手术。因 OIF(n=61)、创伤(n=33)、复发性感染(n=15)、因获益不足而选择择期移除(n=1)、美容原因(n=1)或不明原因(n=16)导致的植入物总丢失率(即植入物丢失)为 13.3%(952 个中的 127 个;研究间范围为 0%-40%)。使用的植入物类型存在差异;宽直径植入物在植入物存活率方面似乎更具优势,在不良反应皮肤方面相似,而单阶段手术和软组织保留似乎不会导致更高的植入物丢失率或增加不良反应皮肤反应,这基于有限的文献量。

结论

一般来说,BAHI 是儿童听力康复的一种安全方法,但研究间存在较大差异。新手术技术和植入物设计在儿科人群中的结果似乎很有前景,但需要更多的研究才能得出明确的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验