Inpatient Medicine, Banner University Medical Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Endoscopy. 2020 Apr;52(4):259-267. doi: 10.1055/a-1098-1817. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Gastric variceal bleeding carries significant mortality in the setting of portal hypertension. Among the endoscopic treatment options, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided glue and/or coil injection is a novel approach, but its role in the treatment of gastric varices is not established due to a lack of robust data.
We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (inception to June 2019) to identify studies evaluating EUS in the treatment of gastric varices. Our primary goals were to estimate the pooled rates of treatment efficacy, obliteration and recurrence of gastric varices, early and late rebleeding, and adverse events with EUS-guided therapy in gastric varices. We also searched for studies that evaluated direct endoscopic glue (END-glue) injection for treatment of gastric varices, and used the pooled rates as comparators.
23 studies (851 patients) evaluating EUS-guided therapy were included. The pooled treatment efficacy was 93.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 89.5 - 96.3, = 53.7), gastric varices obliteration was 84.4 % (95 %CI 74.8 - 90.9, = 77), gastric varices recurrence was 9.1 % (95 %CI 5.2 - 15.7, = 32), early rebleeding was 7.0 % (95 %CI 4.6 - 10.7, = 0), and late rebleeding was 11.6 % (95 %CI 8.8 - 15.1, = 22). The rates were comparable to END-glue therapy (28 studies, 3467 patients) except for obliteration, which was significantly better with EUS-guided therapy. On subgroup analysis, EUS-coil/glue combination showed superior outcomes.
EUS-guided therapy demonstrated clinical efficacy for treatment of gastric varices in terms of obliteration, recurrence, and long-term rebleeding, and may be superior to END-glue.
胃静脉曲张出血在门静脉高压症患者中死亡率很高。在各种内镜治疗选择中,内镜超声(EUS)引导下的胶和/或线圈注射是一种新方法,但由于缺乏有力的数据,其在胃静脉曲张治疗中的作用尚未确定。
我们对多个数据库(从建立到 2019 年 6 月)进行了全面检索,以确定评估 EUS 治疗胃静脉曲张的研究。我们的主要目标是估计 EUS 治疗胃静脉曲张的疗效、闭塞和再出血率、早期和晚期再出血率以及不良事件的汇总率。我们还搜索了评估直接内镜胶(END-胶)注射治疗胃静脉曲张的研究,并将汇总率作为对照。
共纳入 23 项研究(851 例患者)评估 EUS 引导治疗。汇总的治疗效果为 93.7%(95%置信区间 89.5%至 96.3%, = 53.7),胃静脉曲张闭塞率为 84.4%(95%置信区间 74.8%至 90.9%, = 77),胃静脉曲张复发率为 9.1%(95%置信区间 5.2%至 15.7%, = 32),早期再出血率为 7.0%(95%置信区间 4.6%至 10.7%, = 0),晚期再出血率为 11.6%(95%置信区间 8.8%至 15.1%, = 22)。这些比率与 END-胶治疗(28 项研究,3467 例患者)相当,除了闭塞率外,EUS 引导治疗明显更好。亚组分析显示,EUS-线圈/胶联合治疗效果更好。
EUS 引导治疗在胃静脉曲张的闭塞、复发和长期再出血方面显示出临床疗效,可能优于 END-胶。