Krenkova Jana, Dusa Filip, Cmelik Richard
Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Electrophoresis. 2020 May;41(9):684-690. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900475. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
In this work, we compare labeling by two negatively charged fluorescent labels, 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) and 8-(2-hydrazino-2-oxoethoxy)pyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (Cascade Blue hydrazide [CBH]). Effectiveness of the labeling chemistries were investigated by 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and maltoheptaose followed by LC/UV-MS and CE/LIF analysis, respectively. The reaction yield of APTS labeling was determined to be only ∼10%. This is due to reduction of almost 90% of the analyte by sodium cyanoborohydride to alcohol, which cannot be further labeled via reductive amination. However, the CBH labeling provides ∼90% reaction yield based on the LC/UV-MS measurements. The significantly higher labeling yield was also confirmed by CE/LIF measurements. Finally, the more effective hydrazone formation technique of CBH was characterized and applied for N-linked glycan analysis by CE/LIF.
在本研究中,我们比较了两种带负电荷的荧光标记物8-氨基芘-1,3,6-三磺酸(APTS)和8-(2-肼基-2-氧代乙氧基)芘-1,3,6-三磺酸(级联蓝酰肼[CBH])的标记情况。分别通过4-羟基苯甲醛和麦芽七糖对标记化学的有效性进行了研究,随后分别进行了液相色谱/紫外-质谱(LC/UV-MS)分析和毛细管电泳/激光诱导荧光(CE/LIF)分析。APTS标记的反应产率仅为约10%。这是因为约90%的分析物被氰基硼氢化钠还原为醇,而醇不能通过还原胺化进一步标记。然而,基于LC/UV-MS测量,CBH标记的反应产率约为90%。CE/LIF测量也证实了显著更高的标记产率。最后,对更有效的CBH腙形成技术进行了表征,并将其应用于通过CE/LIF进行的N-连接聚糖分析。