Suppr超能文献

采用还原胺化和腙形成化学方法进行寡糖标记的比较。

Comparison of oligosaccharide labeling employing reductive amination and hydrazone formation chemistries.

作者信息

Krenkova Jana, Dusa Filip, Cmelik Richard

机构信息

Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Electrophoresis. 2020 May;41(9):684-690. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900475. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Abstract

In this work, we compare labeling by two negatively charged fluorescent labels, 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) and 8-(2-hydrazino-2-oxoethoxy)pyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (Cascade Blue hydrazide [CBH]). Effectiveness of the labeling chemistries were investigated by 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and maltoheptaose followed by LC/UV-MS and CE/LIF analysis, respectively. The reaction yield of APTS labeling was determined to be only ∼10%. This is due to reduction of almost 90% of the analyte by sodium cyanoborohydride to alcohol, which cannot be further labeled via reductive amination. However, the CBH labeling provides ∼90% reaction yield based on the LC/UV-MS measurements. The significantly higher labeling yield was also confirmed by CE/LIF measurements. Finally, the more effective hydrazone formation technique of CBH was characterized and applied for N-linked glycan analysis by CE/LIF.

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了两种带负电荷的荧光标记物8-氨基芘-1,3,6-三磺酸(APTS)和8-(2-肼基-2-氧代乙氧基)芘-1,3,6-三磺酸(级联蓝酰肼[CBH])的标记情况。分别通过4-羟基苯甲醛和麦芽七糖对标记化学的有效性进行了研究,随后分别进行了液相色谱/紫外-质谱(LC/UV-MS)分析和毛细管电泳/激光诱导荧光(CE/LIF)分析。APTS标记的反应产率仅为约10%。这是因为约90%的分析物被氰基硼氢化钠还原为醇,而醇不能通过还原胺化进一步标记。然而,基于LC/UV-MS测量,CBH标记的反应产率约为90%。CE/LIF测量也证实了显著更高的标记产率。最后,对更有效的CBH腙形成技术进行了表征,并将其应用于通过CE/LIF进行的N-连接聚糖分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验