Degno Federica, Liversedge Simon P
School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Marsh Ln, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Vision (Basel). 2020 Feb 3;4(1):11. doi: 10.3390/vision4010011.
The present review is addressed to researchers in the field of reading and psycholinguistics who are both familiar with and new to co-registration research of eye movements (EMs) and fixation related-potentials (FRPs) in reading. At the outset, we consider a conundrum relating to timing discrepancies between EM and event related potential (ERP) effects. We then consider the extent to which the co-registration approach might allow us to overcome this and thereby discriminate between formal theoretical and computational accounts of reading. We then describe three phases of co-registration research before evaluating the existing body of such research in reading. The current, ongoing phase of co-registration research is presented in comprehensive tables which provide a detailed summary of the existing findings. The thorough appraisal of the published studies allows us to engage with issues such as the reliability of FRP components as correlates of cognitive processing in reading and the advantages of analysing both data streams (i.e., EMs and FRPs) simultaneously relative to each alone, as well as the current, and limited, understanding of the relationship between EM and FRP measures. Finally, we consider future directions and in particular the potential of analytical methods involving deconvolution and the potential of measurement of brain oscillatory activity.
本综述面向阅读与心理语言学领域的研究人员,他们既熟悉阅读中眼动(EM)与注视相关电位(FRP)的同步记录研究,又对此研究尚属新手。首先,我们思考一个与眼动和事件相关电位(ERP)效应的时间差异有关的难题。接着,我们探讨同步记录方法在多大程度上能使我们克服这一难题,从而区分阅读的形式理论和计算模型。然后,我们描述同步记录研究的三个阶段,之后对阅读领域的此类现有研究进行评估。同步记录研究当前正在进行的阶段以综合表格形式呈现,这些表格详细总结了现有研究结果。对已发表研究的全面评估使我们能够探讨诸如FRP成分作为阅读中认知加工相关指标的可靠性、同时分析两种数据流(即眼动和FRP)相对于单独分析每种数据流的优势,以及当前对眼动和FRP测量之间关系的有限理解等问题。最后,我们考虑未来的方向,特别是涉及反卷积的分析方法的潜力以及脑振荡活动测量的潜力。