Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2012 Mar;76(2):145-58. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0376-x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
The development of theories and computational models of reading requires an understanding of processing constraints, in particular of timelines related to word recognition and oculomotor control. Timelines of word recognition are usually determined with event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded under conditions of serial visual presentation (SVP) of words; timelines of oculomotor control are derived from parameters of eye movements (EMs) during natural reading. We describe two strategies to integrate these approaches. One is to collect ERPs and EMs in separate SVP and natural reading experiments for the same experimental material (but different subjects). The other strategy is to co-register EMs and ERPs during natural reading from the same subjects. Both strategies yield data that allow us to determine how lexical properties influence ERPs (e.g., the N400 component) and EMs (e.g., fixation durations) across neighboring words. We review our recent research on the effects of frequency and predictability of words on both EM and ERP measures with reference to current models of eye-movement control during reading. Results are in support of the proposition that lexical access is distributed across several fixations and across brain-electric potentials measured on neighboring words.
阅读理论和计算模型的发展需要理解处理限制,特别是与单词识别和眼球运动控制有关的时间线。单词识别的时间线通常是通过在连续视觉呈现 (SVP) 条件下记录事件相关电位 (ERPs) 来确定的;眼球运动控制的时间线则来自自然阅读过程中眼动 (EM) 参数。我们描述了两种整合这些方法的策略。一种是在同一个实验材料(但不同的被试)的单独 SVP 和自然阅读实验中收集 ERP 和 EM。另一种策略是在同一个被试的自然阅读过程中对 EM 和 ERP 进行共同注册。这两种策略都产生了数据,使我们能够确定词汇属性如何影响 ERP(例如,N400 成分)和 EM(例如,注视持续时间)在相邻单词之间的变化。我们回顾了最近关于词汇频率和可预测性对 EM 和 ERP 测量的影响的研究,参考了当前阅读过程中眼球运动控制的模型。研究结果支持了词汇通达是在几个注视点上分布的,并且跨越了在相邻单词上测量的脑电潜力的观点。